I have been, am currently, a member of more than a handful of gambling boards/websites. This topic comes up several times a year......all over the place. You can't win betting RLM. You can't. A person who is trying to follow "sharp" money will always get the worst of the number. ALWAYS.
Oh, you may win over a short cycle......a week, a month, maybe even couple of months. But over a large enough sample size, you constantly getting the worse of the number will erode your bankroll. That half run of value you lost on a bases total? That extra juice you pay that the sharps didn't on a side? That move you were forced to eat on a half point off a key number in football? That point or two on a hoops total?
All of that, and more, will cause you to lose. Because now you have to hit more winners than the "sharp", just to make the same units. It can't be done.
I have seen countless threads where someone claims they can beat the man by strictly using RLM. I have NEVER seen it successfully done. I'm talking a 1000 bets. Not this weekend. Not on 2 games tonight. Most who start the endeaver, with good intentions, usually flame out pretty quickly.
And look in the mirror and ask yourself this question: "if the books can be beat by releasing this information, WHY would they allow the release of the information". They can't be beat with it - that is your answer.