Fezzik said:
I am amazed at the haters out there, we put out a great Video on why the normally idiotic Martingale strategy was proper to bet JAMES UNDER points, UNDER points/reb/assists......and guys RIP on on, NO CLUE how good that prop was gonna get
1. You are results playing.
2. How do you Martingale a prop?
3. No one commented on whether it was a bad bet just no need to be doubling down on it
4. You had no clue that Kerr was going to change to a small lineup and Cle would feed Mozgov all night to exploit a mismatch and thus making the CLE offense less LBJ-centric and GS defense more LBJ-centric.
5. The future does not exist in the present moment, you are guessing with this stuff and you guessed right. Congratulations.
That doesn't mean Martingaling this prop was the correct. You are assuming way too much risk with this strategy and the upside is not worth the potential downside.