AZ & Soko - Hey, I can certainly understand why anyone would have voted for Trump last time, especially if you buy into the "lesser of two evils" mantra - which I don't. That concept is complete BS, and it's a propaganda tool used to keep people from straying from the Rep Party and Dem Party, where both parties are owned.
And AZ ... I am with you on the Dems and Media putting all their energy into *hating* Trump, as opposed to intelligent discussion of policies. The Russiagate thing was a joke start to finish and was always nothing but a distraction to keep the focus off of why Clinton lost ...
Again - I can understand why people went with Trump in the first instance, because he appeared to be "outsider" candidate, where the system and all of its insiders are irretrievably corrupt. I can even understand why people choose to defend him against nonsensical attacks.
But .... what has he changed for the good? What about "draining the swamp?" How is going with Goldman Sachs bankers and Bush Neocons - like that MORON Bolton - draining the swamp or changing anything important?????
People were also enamored with Obama's "Hope and Change" message and he did not change a g*dD*amn thing that mattered. What on Earth has Trump changed that matters????
Don't get me wrong ... I think that both those guys might have actually wanted to change a thing or two - but the way you control politicians is the old fashioned stick and carrot -A/K/A blackmail and bribes - and both Obama and Trump are imminently bribable and black-mailable.
We need someone who can't be blackmailed, bribed and owned. I think there are just a few choices who potentially fit that description ... Tulsi is one of them, and this can be seen by honest Right Wing people such as Ron Paul backing her - and the honest right wing people who responded to the Drudge Poll (which also predicted Trump's win last time).