clonedlion said:
It’s possible this Clemson staff needs a nfl QB (Watson and TL) and now without they struggle.
AJ is making the case that you could’ve made against BC or NC state as well. At some point. They are who they are.
I'm saying the following. 1. No matter how much less talented we think clemson is compared to previous clemson teams they are MORE talented then Syracuse. No one would argue that. (Yes you could say the same thing about BC and NC State)
2. Clemson is 0-5 ATS this year. Of course you are paying a premium for the name clemson but I believe after an 0-5 ATS that premium is gone. (Can't say the same about BC or NC State game)
3. Syracuse is 5-1 ATS. Starting to be overvalued....Maybe
4. also Clemson offense isn't great but every game they have played they have kept their opponent to their lowest or second lowest point total. The defense is still real.
5. I also believe their is something in the fact that Clemson isn't the team this year. You could make an argument they get up for the syracuse game more this year than they ever have.
Has clemson scored this year. No but if they put it together they cover this number easy. and this number I feel like is at its lowest point.