I'm going to attempt to explain as nicely as possible why some of the people in here who have been doing it for awhile don't respect what your doing Mr c.
I have followed you enough to know for the most part your simple. Your group just wants to win. You shoot for high win percentages and make picks with high juice.
Your way of doing this looks good on paper. You win 90 percent of the time and in general a lot of people fall for this 'trap'.. I gamble the exact opposite of you. Almost always on the plus side.
Here's why your way isn't practical in reality vs paper.
1st I would ask how you define units. I think of 100 units as my entire bankroll. (I think that's common thought maybe I'm wrong in that assumption)
These bets below you will hit 90 percent of the time and still be a loser in the long run. Plus for people who think of units the way I do you are advising them to risk 50 percent of their entire bank roll to win 2 percent. You just can't make these bets in real life and be successful. And it creates this logical fallacy where you can post on a thread like this and b e like see it works and it may work all year.... but you lose one of these it wipes everything out.
In the thread above your 40 in the hole and betting 20 units. You end up winning so you chased and succeeded. But literally this chase is what ends some people.
I'm not out here saying good bettors should be flat bettors but you can't bet 1 unit sometimes and 20 or 30 units other times.
This thread above I think you also won but your 40 units down being 17 units if you lost that game your done.
The other two are just examples of chasing that again worked out for you this time I believe... but if you want to be respected no one will respect someone who says put half your bank roll on a random Nov hockey game. But maybe you define units differently then I do.
I'm just attempting to be a middle man and to explain what other people see