Guess I'm just the broken record here yet again (I'm 100% with Norm regarding the immense usefulness of Action Network as a whole) that these are not "picks" at ALL. DMan is simply trying to find a way to make money using different betting systems.
The Action Network writes a column daily for each sport with a couple of observations where sharp money has gone in some select contests. Not only is no one at Action Network telling anyone to follow or endorsing any side in these articles...by the time it is written the sharps have (obviously?) zapped a lot of the line's value....part of the very reason said line made the write up. There are sharps on dozens more situations throughout the day that just didn't happen to peak the writer's interest or was unnoticed. One could argue the responsible play after reading the article WOULD be to fade the written up plays.
For instance...sharp money was all over WV as it shows....raise your hand if that makes you excited to rush to the window and grab up the 3.5 or 4 points compared to the 6 points available beforehand?