As someone who does not buy picks I could care less about VR's winning %. His value is his Sports Betting Landscape KNOWLEDGE.
In addition, like it or not, HOW a message is delivered matters.
Someone else mentioned VR being a Carnival barker bringing ppl into the tent. They surely meant it derisively but a positive and more informed way to put that would be that he is 'Entertaining with his Sports Gambling Opinions.'
We all like Dan Patrick, Colin, and Rome, not for their correct "TAKES" or their % of correct opinions but because they are Informed + Entertaining...But again, Im not here to buy picks rather for information. Any want to claim that VR is Uninformed?
Its clear that VR knows his shit AND knows how to deliver it in a way that forces ppl to listen. Style matters. Especially when were talking about Numbers and Math.
How many understand the 'ASAIN Handicap' for Soccer? (I'll add #Iran +2, +2.5 -111 here for those that do)
I bet you'd listen to VR explain it. And do so regardless of his 'Soccer play winning %!'
I bet you'd 'Sprinkle a little something on that Money Line'
That will be missed.