Everyone in the football contests gets the same lines, so the weak lines, stale lines crap the haters say doesn't mean anything. No you wont win at the same rate if you bet vs the current lines, so if he picks 67% maybe you'll get 62%, but still 62% is spectacular. Betting his Hilton stuff at the current lines you would still likely hit at least 62%. And since everyone is graded equally, he's still the best of the best. And he did it TWO YEARS IN A ROW!
RJ tells us many times that Fezzik is killing it in basketball and kills it every year in March. So why shouldn't I be betting him? Last year in March he went 83-48. I'm not greedy, Im just looking for his long term 55%. But the 1-20 I'm at following him this week isnt cutting the mustard. And disappearing today and not giving us a focus or not giving us any analysis with the plays, just a "analysis later" that never comes, isn't good for business. We paid good money for this stuff and have gotten killed, and telling us "well you need to pay $1000 a month to get my REALLY GOOD stuff, the Bet Like a Pro where I am killing it," isnt' cutting the mustard either. I buy picks that go 0-3 and get told that if I"d bought the Bet Like Pro package I'd have gotten 3 more winners for a split? Come on.
And yeah, roughing the punter, roughing the donkeys, boozin and losin, come on. There's a reason why all these haters have such ridiculous names. Why would you take people with those names seriously?