The 2011 National Championship Game last night was so atrocious that it was like watching two blind people play Double Dribble on the old Nintendo. People love to root for the Cinderella upsets, but when they happen after the first round you end up with a joke of a Final Four like we did this year. Toss out the fact the Connecticut Huskies won a 53-41 shoot-out (insert joke) to capture the title, they were still the 9th ranked team out of the Big East. Say what you want, but they play Duke, Kansas or Ohio State one hundred times they lose 70 or 80 of those games. Butler, or as they are known as now"Brick-a-Saurus-Rex" , hit 12 of 64 shots for an amazing 18.8%. Virginia Commonwealth had to win a play in game to make the tournament, so we can leave it at that. Kentucky, who I am a fan of, rounds out the Final Four making the tournament as a #4 seed. No Duke, no Ohio State, no Kansas, no Pittsburgh. Instead we get stuck watching #3 seeded Uconn (which is mainly based on the 5 wins in 5 days to win the Big East title) and the #8 seed Butler for all the marbles. Ouch. Historically, the Final Four weeds out the weak and we are left with the best of the best and get to close it out watching the elite teams battle for the title. To understand how cheated I feel in what the Final Four consisted of in 2011, let me break down the past 10 years:2010: #5 Michigan State, #5 Butler (runner-up), #2 West Virginia, #1 Duke (champion)2009: #2 Michigan State (runner-up), #1 Connecticut, #1 North Carolina (champion), #3 Villanova2008: #1 North Carolina, #1 Kansas (champion), #1 Memphis (runner-up), #1 UCLA2007: #1 Florida (champion), #2 UCLA, #2 Georgetown, #1 Ohio State (runner-up)2006: #4 LSU, #2 UCLA (runner-up), #11 George Mason (blown-out), #3 Florida (champion)2005: #1 Illinois (runner-up), #4 Louisville, #1 North Carolina (champion), #5 Michigan State2004: #2 Oklahoma State, #3 Georgia Tech (runner-up), #1 Duke, #2 Connecticut (champion) 2003: #3 Syracuse (champion), #1 Texas, #3 Marquette, #2 Kansas(runner-up)2002: #1 Maryland (champion), #1 Kansas, #5 Indiana (runner-up),#2 Oklahoma2001: #1 Duke (champion), #3 Maryland, #1 Michigan State, #2 Arizona (runner-up)The fact is having an elite team go down is exciting too watch, but in the end it does not change you miss getting to see the top squads battle it out. Two of the Final Four teams were not even ranked in the Top 25 and only Connecticut was ranked in the Top 10 (#9). So root all you want for a team like Butler, but missing out seeing Duke vs. Kansas is not worth having the excitement of a below average team playing for the title. Next season I would gladly pass on watching all the upsets happen to not get stuck with the garbage we all had to endure last night. Think about it. A team who had to win a play in game was up against a team not ranked in the Top 25 to decide who played for the The 2011 National Championship. That is not exciting to me. That is a joke.
Just bitter that a "play in team" potentially could play for the title. But great point on the players leaving early.
Good article, but I think Butler is becoming a premiere team. They just need to get one big time player or a couple really good guys. They've beaten so many good teams in the tournament over the last two years so I don't know how they can't be considered one of the better teams.
tell the supposedly good teams to win...if they are so good they should not be losing.....upsets happen and its one and done ...everyone knows it coming in...is it VCU fault they beat KU and Fla....tell the big boys to step it up...on same note u will continue to see this since the top players ,or most of them ,leave early...and most of them play for the larger well known schools
The format is fine. I am just bitching that the Final Four sucked. A team who won a play in game went against a non-Top 25 team for a chance to be crowned National Champion.
What do you suggest johnny, that college hoops go to the format like college football. Just take the 4 would be 1 seeds and skip the tourney and go right to the final 4?