Random Thoughts
Would you knowingly wager or gamble money on a sporting event which you knew wasn't officiated correctly, even when virtually every effort was made to offer the official the very best tools to review and make the correct decision?
What metric do you attribute to variance in your handicapping metric for completely random incorrect officiating after you have studied past performance, trends, betting markets, coaching match ups, injuries, strength of schedule, schedule, variance etc.
At the end of the day .. whats the difference between throwing a dart and "Handicapping" a game over a large sample?
Is the guy throwing a dart, considered "Sharp" ?
It appears that games are defined by officiating and not necessarily the performance of the players. How to adjust to multiplication of the event by officiating which cannot get the call correct?
Thoughts?