SEC -200 to win 2014 BCS Title (every other conference +175); implying SEC Champ is 65% likely (via @WilliamHillUS)Would you lay the -200 or take the +175?
---RJ Bell: Best Bets | Free Picks | My Posts |My Blog |@TwitterCalled a "True Insider" by ESPNPick Virgins: $25 FREE! Buyers: 10% rebate!I am a Pregame.com Director of the Boards!
-200
"You never go full Retard"
"EVERY DOG HAS HIS DAY"
RJ_Bell Would you lay the -200 or take the +175?
Would you lay the -200 or take the +175?
Dave's Home Page w/Marble Count and Daily Message
Dave's MLB Early Bird
Follow Dave on Twitter
Of any big win we have had, or winning streak, or even coming out of a losing streak, of this I am most proud:
Some forum posters have broken into the industry and have achieved moderate success while carrying themselves with professionalism and integrity. Dave Essler, of the pick-selling site Pregame, immediately comes to mind.
"I am a Pregame.com Director of the Boards!"
SEC REPRESENTATIVE IN BCS TITLE GAMES
2006 FLORIDA +7
2007 LSU -4
2008 Florida -6 (but it opened around 3)
2009 Bama-4
2010 Auburn -1 (opened at 3)
2011 SEC vs SEC , so automatic winner
2012 Bama -9.5
By this data you couldve layed around -200 or less in the championship game alone, a majority of the time and not have your money tied up for 6 months.
I'm not very bright but how is betting both even remotely profitable?
Toofdoc I'm not very bright but how is betting both even remotely profitable?
Rj. I would take that prime-time +175 time for a change.
I think he meant "either" instead of both. No matter which side you take now, there will be opportunities to bet the other side during the season and lock in a small profit