ROCKDEMANSPORTS1 said:
Thats a simple question not a angry response but pay - after you win is a tax ? YOUR UNREAL
WHAT DO YOU CALL SERVICES THAT CHARGE UP FRONT MONEY !!
Not surprisingly there are no question marks so I'll take a shot at what your actual question is. The answer to why I am doing it despite you saying you will no longer post plays past the 15th is you will no doubt use the performance of this system as a tool to try and get new customers.
Once again, it nice for potential customers to be informed of the true past performance of something they're buying. I'm posting the record of your plays posted in the forum with units lost. If your response is "go away and let me use my inflated record with no mention of units lost so I can get more customers", then I think that speaks volumes.
I would call most services that charge you up front a scam because most do not win. If you'd like me to explain what I mean by a "tax" I'd be happy to.
It's flawed thinking to say "I'm only being charged when I win so it's not a big deal". You're not thinking of the big picture when making a statement like that.
Use the following example:
A $100 bettor uses a service that charges $10 for every win. A bettor thinks that's great because he's only giving back some of his profits when he wins.
At -110, 53% would normally be break even. If you won 53 out of 100 games following this pay after you win service, you'd be up $130 from the picks, minus $530 for the cost after each win for a total of -$400.
The person you follow would have to hit 55% just to break even. Essentially they'd need to be one of the best sports bettors in the world (who just happens to sell $10 pay after you win picks) and hit 57% or more to turn a decent profit.
If he charges less, or you bet more, obviously there's more room for error, and less need to hit at such an unattainable percentage. But the "well you only pay after you win so what's the risk?" No matter the charge or wager amount is just wrong