The312 said:

rcgrimes said:

Definitely playing this system with more focus this year. Plenty of games this week to choose from to cash. Added in the Wong adjusted and the current (my local).

Ravens +9 (+3)
GB +8 (+2)
Pitt +9 (+3)
NYG +7.5 (+1.5)
Cincinnati -2 (-8)
Indy +9 (+3)
LV +9 (+3)
Wash +9 (+3)
Dallas +8.5 (+2.5

What's the Wong system? Buying 6 pts?

312 - I use a slightly modified version of the Wong system.  Any of the games listed above that are at +9(+3) are outside of the standard version and utilize the system described below. It's also best to only do a 2 or 3 teamer.  Should the guy I follow for this and other details update for the new season, I will post the whole thing for everyone to review in more detail.

"Our methodology for playing 6-point teasers is similar to Blackjack expert Stanford Wong's strategy:

• Tease the underdog when the line is +1½, +2, +2½, or +3

• Tease the favorite when the line is -7½, -8, -8½, or -9.

NOTE: The original Wong Criteria do not include +3 or -9 but this is how the post was done previously so we will continue to use them. Over the past 3 years it has only made a difference of about 1.5% to include those.

It is not recommended to tease game totals.

The reasoning behind this methodology is that games are frequently decided by a final margin of 3, 6, or 7. So we play teasers in such a manner that we gain these numbers in the teaser movement."

Also (Stats do not include last year's numbers. Should be up soon and will share as soon as I can).

Historically, *As of 08/26/22, the historical data has been standardized to the s3.sportsdatabase.com SDQL query for each teaser record. This yearly data report is run through that year’s regular season. This data excludes pushes. EX: Year 2018 data is collected from Week 1 to Week 17. 2021 season will be 18 weeks.

6 Point Teasers -

Year	Spread	Record	Win %
2018	+1½ thru +3	59-18	76.62%
2019	+1½ thru +3	52-18	74.29%
2020	+1½ thru +3	60-16	78.95%
2021	+1½ thru +3	67-17	79.76%
2022	+1½ thru +3	61-21	74.39%
2018	-7½ thru -9	18-3	85.71%
2019	-7½ thru -9	13-4	76.47%
2020	-7½ thru -9	25-3	89.29%
2021	-7½ thru -9	24-5	82.76%
2022	-7½ thru -9	15-6	71.43%

Curious what you are paying for your 2-team 6-point teasers? I grew up on -110; then -115; -120 past few years; then last season my last -120 went to -125 mid-week (William Hill in Las Vegas). I have Stations and WH available at -125 this season in Las Vegas. So little competition out here past few years. Searching for better prices, but several books haven't offered 2-teamers at remotely playable odds (Westgate) or even at all for years (Golden Nugget)

Would love if you’d post these WONG OPTIONS for college football. I’ve used teasers like this with decent results last year.

pwilson7 said:

Curious what you are paying for your 2-team 6-point teasers? I grew up on -110; then -115; -120 past few years; then last season my last -120 went to -125 mid-week (William Hill in Las Vegas). I have Stations and WH available at -125 this season in Las Vegas. So little competition out here past few years. Searching for better prices, but several books haven't offered 2-teamers at remotely playable odds (Westgate) or even at all for years (Golden Nugget)

I have a local that gives me -120 for 2 teasers and am very lucky for that

 Paying -130 or more for a 2 teamer is a sign to nor play with that book.

msucurt said:

Would love if you’d post these WONG OPTIONS for college football. I’ve used teasers like this with decent results last year.

Two parts to your question.

1) there are too many teams/games to track for effective evaluation.

2) Never tease college as there are too many variables, trick plays, "showing up," they are still kids, etc that lead to bad results.

Teasing conference games where unranked home team vs ranked visitor is an option.