Interesting
What about Ala/Tex or am I misunderstanding what you meant?Have made money betting a lower ranked team as a favorite vs a higher ranked opponent but just Polls top 25 worked better for CBb though

onetrikpony said:

Interesting
What about Ala/Tex or am I misunderstanding what you meant?Have made money betting a lower ranked team as a favorite vs a higher ranked opponent but just Polls top 25 worked better for CBb though

EACH TEAM RANKED ABOVE  

Yep. Teams Massey ranks 100 or higher.

And I never looked at teams that had no number next to them, such as Lafayette against Temple. Temple is 126 but Lafayette isn’t showing a ranking, unless you click on Lafayette and it states they’re ranked 167. Since I haven’t looked at such games in the past, my guess would be that an unranked(no number shown next to team) team doesn’t have a good chance of an upset. Whereas two teams ranked 113 and 120 suck equally and one won’t outplay the other by a large number. 

I see it now he calls it above 100 in that the # is higher than 100
I call that below 100 in that the team is worse than 100th ranked I knew I was misunderstanding something

Trend makes sense

onetrikpony said:

I see it now he calls it above 100 in that the # is higher than 100
I call that below 100 in that the team is worse than 100th ranked I knew I was misunderstanding something

You got it, OTP.

AWR1051 said:

Trend makes sense

Thanks, AWR. I’m going to track it and see if it plays out like it did last year. 

Good luck Volt!

Thanks 7!

2-1 yesterday. Rankings are from before the game was played.

Winner
#114 MTSU……………….34
#110 Colorado St (-14)..19

Loser
#127 Florida Intl…………12
#120 Texas St (-13.5)…..41

Winner
#129 New Mexico St……13
#123 UTEP (-17.5)……….20

When there is two bad teams playing in any sport, I almost always end up on the dog if I play the game. Good chance for a straight up win as well. It is a solid trend considering the favorite isn't used to winning games as it is.