Very small sample size in this format, yes.
In my opinion, baseball is about momentum more than any other big 4 sport.
That said, I would like to see another 10 years of results before giving that much credence (1 outta 8) to it these 3 game series.

Fabbs62 said:

Very small sample size in this format, yes.
In my opinion, baseball is about momentum more than any other big 4 sport.
That said, I would like to see another 10 years of results before giving that much credence (1 outta 8) to it these 3 game series.

Agree 100%

one cant rely on a trend of this small sample without consideration of a possible reason for it. "...the world is going to roll me, im not the sharpest tool in the shed....only shooting stars break the mold..." pressure in 3game series on teams down 0-1... getting 3 +$ and 1 short (-120) for the test...

full transparency, i am not on the four to finish. already had skin on o's. think kc's O is anemic. if opposing teams would just walk witt everytime, think their win % goes up 100%. proximity, guess fan root for them (o's) as well. no skin on braves being 40+yr fan. do think lefties give padres some issues. argggh. sale and fried would have been great 1, 2 punch. anyway...if was objective, would have rolled dice on the 4 sweeps, turns out only 2.... gl phil whatever u do!

RP1 Thanks for the TIP!!!! Looks like history repeats itself.

Cheers all and glad you cashed, Walleye!

Segal behind the dish (15-17 W/L, 17-14 O/U) for Mets @ Brew Crew.

Cuzzi behind the dish (21-9 W/L, 12-14 O/U) for Braves @ Friars.

So according to this stat. If I am reading this correct. Mets/Over and Braves/Under? Would be the leans?

Segal AVG is 9.03. 65% strikes usually keeps the swing rate up in non-ace situation which we have here. He also avg. 2.6 homers 5.3 walks 17 strikeouts

And the umpire is NOT the item u need to be looking at so much...it is the familiarity both teams have with the opposing pitcher with their success rate