Sports Betting: What are some common square mistakes?

Pregame Blogs

A description has not yet been added to this group.

Sports Betting: What are some common square mistakes?

  • Comments 22

 http://www.financialhack.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/square-watermellons.png

First off, everyone loves to be a square at one time or another. Personally, I have been booted from close to 10 offshore sportsbooks. At BetUS, they deal me different lines and will only allow me to RISK $500.00 per bet. Bodog will also deal me a sharp line and not allow me to bet the line the majority of their audience is allowed to use. My friend over at Bet Jamaica will allow me to play there, but not credit me any bonuses on a deposit. It is nearly impossible for me to get a local to let me play once I bet a total and it moves 3 points by the time the game kicks. Despite all this, I bet a parlay on the lottery a few weeks back. While in Vegas I love "Wheel of Fortune" slot machines and will toss a $20.00 on the "Big Wheel" despite a house edge of 11-24% (11% for the 1-1 and 25% for the logo/40-1 bets). When bored at home I will always toss in some prop bets on Monday Night Football. Honestly, I have even played blackjack using an online casino (junkie alert). There is nothing wrong with having some fun with gambling, but you should learn there is a difference in fun and wrongly thinking you are making a sharp play.

Bad weather means under: This is one of my favorite ones. A guy betting $100.00 on a football game is the only person on the planet who is aware of wind and rain that is going to hit the area around game time. I mean, why would the people making the lines or the sportsbooks adjusting them (lines)  based off six figures of action not know this? The thing is, everything from public perception to weather conditions is already factored into any line or total. If a fluke storm suddenly is coming, the total will move based of the new valuations based on the new information. Just a quick FYI, your house is not the only place that has the Weather Channel.

Defense wins championships: ESPN did a great study a while back looking at the "Big Dance". The findings showed that a potent offense and possession was more of a factor than a "solid defense". In football, who cares if you have a great defense if you can't score? Remember Vanderbilt a few years back? Great defense but could not ever score. Give me a potent offense with great ball control over a great defense any day. A solid offense can dominate the time of possession, which is one of the main things people tend to not factor in when handicapping sports. If you look at the NFL last season, the team with the better quarterback tended to have a common correlation with covering the spread. There are numerous obvious reasons why this would be the case, but a good QB has the ability to lead the OFFENSE and control the clock AND put up points. If you take the time to break it down, there are many times the GREAT defensive stats are not due to a GREAT defense but rather that the GREAT offense held the ball most of the game and the defenders were able to spend most of the game on the sideline acting like fools everytime the camera is on them.

Bet on Monday Night Football home underdogs: If you bet on the home underdog last season on MNF you would have won an amazing 33% of your wagers. See, one of the BIGGEST mistakes people make is thinking no one knows something but them. If there is an edge or flaw in the lines, due to the money involved, this will eventually be corrected. From the 1970's to around 2000, following this the dog on Monday was hitting close to 60%. Over the past eight years? A coin flip at best. Actually, over the past few seasons, is actually BELOW 50%. Out of all the edges I have seen over the years, this probably could be the longest one to adjust (probably due to the lack of the internet in mass for people and sites to point out flaws in lines). For example, there were some great 2nd half NBA trends involving the Kings a couple years ago, but about a month and a half in, the lines were adjusted and even the juice was inflated to offset the edge. It seemed every single forum on the planet was talking about it and the books saw a huge influx of 2nd half wagers all of a sudden. They put the clamp down on this right away.

I am sure all of us have been at a bar or with friends when someone starts spouting some gambling theory that you know is 100% nonsense. Would love to hear some of your favorite gambling tall tales.

  • Great post JD... here's one of my favs: "That team WILL NOT go 0-3!" It actually could be any record, but I laugh when I hear comments like that.  Any team can have a bad start, or a bad finish, or a bad season all-together.  

  • 100% agree steeltown12. A chasing system never works. People keep saying NO WAY the Lions lose again :)

  • Just thought of a couple more...... There is a difference between winning a game and covering the spread.  Just because you are sure the Redskins will beat the Rams this week, doesn't mean they'll cover the spread.  

    And I never understood pointless match-ups that squares use.  Example this week which my buddy just said: "Peyton Manning vs. Joe Flacco? Come on."  Didn't know they played against each other on the field.

  • I got a buddy that swears "you just bet the best three teams in CFB every week to cover"

  • How does he determine the best 3? Top 10?

  • Cause not only has the top 10 not been covering, they have been losing outright. Has he asked to borrow money yet?

  • What I have noticed recently is people just fading the public. Well, the public isn't always wrong. Money management on the other hand is a totally different story.

  • AMEN altham. The public is not that bad. The house holds 5-7% of every wager WITH the -110 juice. Where the public gets into trouble is with chasing and doubling up when down. You can't fade the public and win.

  • Because, think of it. The books hold say 5% of every bet. So you fade those bets, but you are paying 10% extra on losers, while the books is only paying even money on the losses.

  • Basing too much emphasis on common opponents, for example, Chiefs beat the Broncos, Panthers killed the Chiefs, Broncos beat the Bucs, therefore the Bucs should have no chance vs Panthers.

  • I am glad you agree Johnny. You bring up some very good points. Great Blog.

  • Thanks for sharing altham :)

  • How about "MUST WIN" Games......College & Pro.

  • "This team has killed that team for the last 10 years"  Who cares what that team did against this team 10 years ago...?  None of today's players or coaches were on either team 10 years ago.  

  • I used to feel that way when Dick Vitale announces. I never win. Remember I put everything I was down on Kansas when they played Oklahoma State. I was at work and this we pre-phones that went on the web, etc. So I call a friend to get an update and he was telling me how this big white guy called "Big Country" was dominating and Vitale would not shut up about him. That game started my 0-forever on Vitale games.

Page 1 of 2 (22 items) 12