Ralph Michaels and Brad Powers have nearly 20 combined years as key contributors to Phil Steele Publications and Northcoast Sports. Pregame.com's RJ Bell interviews them, taking us behind the curtain - revealing the process to create the Magazine, and explaining how that work leads to winning college football picks. (August 8, 2016)
RJ Bell - Pregame.com Founder & CEO | Twitter: @RJinVegas
**32-17** (65.3%) All-Time GOY
Follow Me On Twitter : @SleepyJ_Pregame
Click Here - Today's Premium Play
I thoroughly enjoyed doing this podcast and I certainly look forward to doing the CFB Dream Podcasts in the Fall. With that being said, we hardly touched the surface in this podcast of what goes into Phil Steele's magazine and NC Sports. If anyone needs further clarification or wants to know more about the Phil Steele magazine process and handicapping philosophies, feel free to ask...I'll try to answer as sincerely as I can.
Brad Powers – Former lead CFB writer for Northcoast’s Power Sweep | Homepage
Note a key pattern for all of us.......when we talk CFB 'Totals', we ALL get more excited. Some of THE VERY BEST bets one can make are mid week on CFB Totals. And closer to gameday with weather or player changes....
Steve Fezzik - Only 2-Time SuperContest Champion | @FezzikSports
If you guys sat down and did the 10% of the "interpretation of the data" - the subjective part - what would happen if you guys came up with a different "conclusion"? Or did you have separate teams to analyze to avoid that?
Dave's Home Page w/Marble Count and Daily Message
Follow Dave on Twitter
Some forum posters have broken into the industry and have achieved moderate success while carrying themselves with professionalism and integrity. Dave Essler, of the pick-selling site Pregame, immediately comes to mind.
"I am a Pregame.com Director of the Boards!"
Great question Dave...while Phil, Ralph and myself would sit down and go over ALL 128 teams (and weekly ATS picks for that matter), Phil was always the guy that had the final say in determining where exactly the teams would be placed as far as projected conference order or the teams' placement in the final Top 40. 90% of the time we deferred to the 9 sets of power ratings we had. Some power ratings were pure talent ratings, some were based off where they were last year and whether or not they were stronger/weaker in the upcoming season (called a plus/minus power rating). Those 9 sets of power ratings would be plugged into each team's schedule to get an idea of how many wins a team was projected to have in conference play and then their overall schedule. We also used all these power ratings when doing weekly ATS picks (although we'd also strongly consider technical and situational handicapping methods).
Where we would override those 9 sets of power ratings is when you deal with coaches like Bill Snyder and Gary Patterson who despite the fact, they don't sign top recruiting classes consistently, they tend to exceed expectations routinely. Ohio State this year is a great example where there could be an override on the data. The Buckeyes are the least experienced team in the country and play a much tougher schedule this year than last. However, Urban Meyer has signed the top recruiting class in the Big Ten in each of the last 5 seasons and they're also 50-4 in his 4 years there. While many respectable power ratings like ESPN's FPI and Bill Connelly's S&P have the Buckeyes ranked in the teens, we'd manually upgrade them due to their past results/performances and that's why the Buckeyes come up #9 in Phil's Power Poll this year and come up #8 in my initial power ratings.
Hope this helps,
go bucks imo!