azcardsfan said:
Trump just makes up shit as he goes and that's where he loses me as a voter.
..Versus having some person who has proven to put the US up for sale through a "foundation", let alone kill of anyone in order gain political advantage (Bengazi).
Good judgment call there. Like Hillbama is any better for calculating what she says even though her history of doing anything well politically is zilch.
I wish people would look at what people do more than what they say. If Hillbama gets elected, the US deserve the President they voted for.. just like the last 8 years.
[/quote]
Is this even a serious comment bro? her history of doing anything well politically is zilch. That's a direct comment you made right? Whether or not I agree with that, we can go on a long debate on that in another setting. But the only point i want to bring up is, what the hell has Trump ever done?? I mean your bias is showing all over the place. Because maybe what you say is partially true, I'll even attest that maybe she hasn't done a lot. I'd have to actually do more research on that. But we know Trump has never held a political office position so we KNOW he has absolutely done zilch. So I don't understand how this is an argument point FOR trump? What the unknown of doing nothing is better than the known of doing nothing? I mean that's the argument you want to form??
This is why exactly I have a problem with some of the voters. Focus on Trump's strong points. His ability to form a world-wide conglomerate, his business deals which I'm sure he's been a part of many to get to where he is at now, or perhaps even his negotiating skills as a business man. But your point is that because she's done nothing while in office and he's never held office, somehow that's a point for him......WHAT?!?