Fezzik, I respect the hell out of you, excellent NFL Capper, but their is no way possible that the Miami Dolphins are equal to Minnesota.
Their honestly might not be one part of the entire Dolphins roster that is better then Minnesota, and that includes quarterback. I'd probably rate Bradford and Tannehill as a toss up, and respect the argument if somebody took Tannehill. Running back, Not in the same stratosphere. Pass catchers are close to equal, although Landry is a possession guy, Stills isn't anything special at all, Cameron hasn't been able to catch a cold in Alaska since coming from the Browns, and Parker has yet to reach his potential and could be on his way to being a bust, but the amount of 1 on 1's Minnesota gets due to the running game significantly helps the Minnesota offense. The Dolphins offensive line has been a major question mark for awhile, especially their run blocking. The defensive line is the strength of the Dolphins, and even that isn't better then Minnesota's. Suh is the best player of the two defensive line, but second, third, and fourth would be Joseph, Griffen, Floyd. Linebackers aren't even in the same stratosphere, as well as secondary. Reshad Jones is a solid safety but the Dolphins arguably have the worst corners in the NFL and their linebackers are extremely weak. You could argue that the Vikings fifth corner, Mackenzie Alexander, would be the second best corner on the Dolphins (Hell, the way Maxwell played last season, maybe even 1). Also, the Vikings are significantly better coached. I liked gase as an OC, but Zimmer is already regarded as one of the top coaches in the league, and it doesn't hurt that he has three former head coaches on his offensive staff.
Respect the hell out of your work Fezz, I always compare your power rankings to mine. This one I highly, highly disagree with. I consider myself pretty objective with Minnesota, and am really, really down on Miami this year (I think they are a 5-6 win team)