Under 119 Clemson 9**
GL. Stay hot.
C-Rob, thanks for the winner last night. What's your reasoning for this pick? Jeff Scott makes a reasonable case to go the other way.
GL Rob, keep up the solid work.
Behold the Turtle.
He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.
--James Bryant Conant
Saw the same thing (re: Jeff's OVER selection)....any resolution??
Resolution for what? That's his play..play or fade
Not here to ruffle any feathers here.....you comment on a post that was not directed to you....if you have nothing good/constructive to say, then please say nothing @ all. We are supposed to represent a community of "respectful, like-minded" people. We are all striving for the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow (MOST of us, anyway...) and, thus, the tenor of anything written in this space should never be laced with "pejorative" sentiments....when they (destructive messages) arise, they should be discarded immediately...with everyone returning to fully participate with more constructive exchanges....
Will f/u separately Carlo.....as always....BOL!!! :o)
Correct and respect is not questioning or asking for reasoning on a FREE pick. Glass house?
Actually I'm fairly certain he asked in a respectful way, free or not, there's no problem with respectfully asking for some analysis or reasoning to a play
Third year sports bettor NFL/ CFB/ CBB/ NBA. Always looking to learn, criticism always welcomed.
This is easy . . . the community has made clear that many find value in analysis - but each poster gets to decide if he wants to provide analysis or not.
RJ Bell - Pregame.com Founder & CEO | Twitter: @RJinVegasFriday: Inside Vegas: Mayweather vs. Pacman