PAC-10 TITLE: Marvelous GOM Match-up at Staples

Forums

Where sports bettors talk!

PAC-10 TITLE: Marvelous GOM Match-up at Staples

  • This post has 12 Replies |
  • 1 Follower
  • PAC-10 TOURNAMENT TITLE.

    Pretty Even Reg-Season:
    1-1 Hm Tm Blowouts
    Combined Score: 
    Washington 169
    California 160

    (1) California vs (3) Washington

    After racking up 63.63% Winners Second Half (& 7-1 all yr w/GOW|GOM), hitting so many favorites, we finally missed w/BOTH DAWGS last night. 

    Must admit to underestimating Cal's Motivation & Washington's ability to overcome NCAA Tourney Pressure ('Win-or-NIT').  Lessons Learned

    Of all the compelling g match-ups today, onc of the most mis-understood, poorly anaylised & CLEARLY ATS-Effected 1-on-1 duels today at Staples is PG.

    On the Surface, we'd will continue to hear that CAL has the unquestioned & significant Match-up advantage at the POINT:

    All-Everything, Bears 5-10 Sr PG J Randle one & only identified flaw in many situations this season has been SIZE ISSUES, thus vs UW's 5-8, diminutive I Thomas, Randle has a Rare, and welcomed reversal of this factor.

    SR Offensive Machine JEROME RANDLE vs

    Enigmatic SOPH ISSAAH THOMAS?

    Of corse, Randle is sensational talent - and his PERFECT First Half Statline vs Ore is a prime example of what the guy provides for the PAC-10 Champ
    Randle's Final PAC-10 Tourney Opening Half Act:
      FG: 8-8
      3's: 4-4
      FT: 2-2
      PF: 0
      PT: 22

    YET - Deeper look, comparing these 2 players
    Statistically produces stunning results:

    Jerome Randle has the Edge in some expected areas:

    Pts
    RANDLE 19 PPG
    THOMAS 17 PPG

    Assists
    RANDLE 4.5/Gm
    THOMAS 2.9/Gm

    eFG
    RANDLE 56%
    THOMAS 48.2%

    TRUE Shooting Percentage
    RANDLE 61.6%
    THOMAS 53.8%

    FT Percentage
    RANDLE 93.3% (2nd in Nation)
    THOMAS 73%

    3-pt Percentage
    RANDLE 41%
    THOMAS 31.5%

    Yet, Thomas has several SIGNIFICANT
    Often unexpected Better Numbers
    (Many obviously vital to UW Tm Effectiveness)

    Pts/40 Min
    RANDLE 21.7  
    THOMAS 22.2

    Rebounds
    RANDLE 2.06/Gm
    THOMAS 4.13/Gm (more than Double)
    (Thomas 2.1 O-Reb/Gm; Randall 1.4)

    Turnovers
    RANDLE 114
    THOMAS 73

    FT Rate
    RANDLE 31.3%
    THOMAS 50.6%
    (Getting into Lane, Drawing PF)

    FT MADE
    RANDLE 125
    THOMAS 147

    Asst/T-O Ratio, almost identical
    RANDLE 1.3
    THOMAS 1.27

    So where the RUBBER Meets the Road,
    Hard to say Thomas is better that Randall

    YET some numbers crunched show
    Thomas is awfully crucial to UW
    And playing at high level he is
    I Thomas is so big for Dawgs

    'Ruland Index' (+/-) 
    RANDLE +2.35
    THOMAS +3.06

    Thomas battling hand injury
    disastrous Half-Doz first few gms of season
    Puts Thomas' numbers in an even better light.
    And gives UW GREAT Shot Today

    Dawgs preeminent statistical numbers MUST be cross-examined w/Bears' Efficiency Numbers

    CAL shooting 60% vs UCLA?
    CAL's Last SIX GM:
    WINS BY:
    W-15
    W-24
    W-16
    W-10
    W-16
    W-13

    6-0 & 9-1 S-U & ATS

    I STILL LIKE Wash stay close all the way, And WIN THIS GM

    Lastly, even w/Cal pulling away from UCLA last night
    Bears played just 7, & Bench not reiiable
    Bears 4th PAC-10 in PF's (17.1/Gm)
    But U-Dub is unprecedented in DRAWING FOULS
    Wash #14 in D-1 (21.7/Gm) 

    Wash repeated & supposed lg size disadvantages
    Ought to be overcome by
    Much greater UW Depth
    And Key Defensive match-ups

    Looking at these numbers shows
    Cal doesn't have as many
    Clear Experience & Size Edges as it may appear

    LINE-UP:
    UW Jr F (6-9 | 240) M Bryan-Amaning  
    CAL Sr F (6-8 | 230) J Boykin

    UW Sr F (6-6 | 215) Q Pondexter  
    CAL So F (6-7 | 215) O Amoke

    UW Jr F (6-6 | 180) J Holiday  
    CAL Sr F (6-6 | 225) T Robertson

    UW So G (5-8 | 185) I Thomas 
    CAL Sr G (5-10 | 172) J Randle

    UW Jr G (5-11 | 185) V Overton
    CAL Sr G (6-5 | 215) P Christopher

    Key Reserves:
    CAL So G (6-3 | 185) J Gutierrez
    UW Fr G (6-3 | 190) A Gaddy

    CAL So G (6-4 | 185) DJ Seeley
    UW So G (6-4 | 205) E Turner

    CAL Sr G (6-3 | 185) N Knezevic
    UW Fr F (6-7 | 255) T Breshers
     
    Role Players (14% Tm Min or Lower)
    CAL Fr 5-11 B Smith
    UW So 6-8 D Gant
    UW So 6-6 S Suggs

    WASH DEF Pressure masked by their HIGH OCTANE Tempo
    6 of 8 Gms, UW kept Opp low 40% FG or lower

    Cal's tendency to have lapses appeared yesterday again
    Falling behind 39-30, till going on 24-5 run to pull away.

    Misc Last Thoughts:
    Cal so good at getting to & Cashing at Line:
    Cal Starters: 22-23 FT v UCLA

    Wash got jitters out vs Ore St
    DOMINATED Stanford entirely

    Cal's HIGH RPI, Great Play
    Six and 9 or 10 Spread Covers
    COULD have made for a -6 Plus Bears' Line
    So Linesmakers MUST feel they know something
    GOTTA be CLEARLY seeking Bear Money!

    Cal playing so Efficient keeps this at from
    Being even BIGGER

    G.O.M. | 3 UNIT
    WASHINGTON +2
    vs CALIFORNIA

    1 UNIT | 4.5 PT TEASER
    KANSAS STATE vs KANSAS | OVER 143
    WASHINGTON vs CALIFORNIA | UNDER 156

    LETS' GET IT!

    "Winning is determined by ones appropriate response to Losing"
    Sleep? Overrated

    Founder: Way-Out-West, LLC ™
    INVIGORATING SPORTS ANALYSIS

    BEAVER NATION: Powered by Orange | Overachieving Since 1868
    "Always a Great Day to be a Beaver"

  •  Great breakdown, Steve! On Washington with you at +2.5, didn't go this far in depth though.

    Let's cash it!

    2011-12 CBB: 1-5 (-3.9 Units)

  • Thanks, Sharp....

    Few more FF's:

    Warning on all taking OVER's here:

    CAL IS 'High Octane' - sorta....

    Bears' O-PPP is outrageous #4 in NCAA (1.2), supremely efficient...YET, their Avg Possessions (TEMPO) continues to DROP as thier FG, eFG, and O-PPP all go UP....CAL is all the way down to #102 in Pace, and Last 10 Gms they've played have seen Cal get more effective looks at hoop out of HALF CT sets, ect.  This REALLY plays into Dawgs Hand...I think.  UW Half-Ct Defense is the key to Dawgs success right now....UW O-Fg% is somewhat poor - as we've stated so many times, UW eFG is below 50% (bottom half of D-1)YET it doesn't seem to matter....as UW is avg 14 'EMPTY TRIPS' Defensively....#1 by FAR in D-1.

    Till this week, UW was only tm in Conf that played faster than Cal ... AZ finished #2 PAC-10 Tempo (69.2 Poss/Gm).

    Dawgs #1 PAC-10 Tempo (#9 NCAA, 74.3 Poss/Gm)

    • FIRST gm Dawgs ran Bears out - 84-69 w/80 Poss in Seattle, in Cal's HIGHEST ttl by far in Conf
    • SECOND GM was slower, yet at the start of Cal's current 9-1 Run, yet only 74 Poss

    BOTH Tms oughta see benefit in a little more deiberate pace.

    Oh, and LASTLY....Linaurdi pronouncing Washington IN now, even though he tabs Dawgs at #64 or 65, or one of 'LAST-4' IN leaves it very tenuous - and UW has played w/APPROPRIATE URGENCY so far in PAC-10 Tourney....w/UH stealing another bid should cancel out ANY sense of comfort UW had coming in. 

    Here we go! 

    "Winning is determined by ones appropriate response to Losing"
    Sleep? Overrated

    Founder: Way-Out-West, LLC ™
    INVIGORATING SPORTS ANALYSIS

    BEAVER NATION: Powered by Orange | Overachieving Since 1868
    "Always a Great Day to be a Beaver"

  • Now that is a game write-up!

    ---

    RJ Bell: Best Bets | Free Picks | My Posts |My Blog |@Twitter
    Called a "True Insider" by ESPN
    Pick Virgins: $25 FREE! Buyers: 10% rebate!
    I am a Pregame.com Director of the Boards!

  • RJ_Bell

    Now that is a game write-up!

     

    Beavs write ups always are. I have to read them twice to soak up all the info, lol.  Chit, even when his play does'nt come through, you can't feel sour in the least. You know with all the %'s, an stats, an inside info, it was the right play.  This one is lookin good hf way through the 2nd, but anything can happen, hopefully I'll be back with one of these.....Yes

  • Nice call on the Huskies, Steve.  Your writeups are always a work of art.  Get 'em again tomorrow.


    FULL TRANSPARENCY!  Click here to view my LONG-TERM records.

    Get FREE PICKS & chat with me on Twitter at Twitter.com/PregameDwayne.

    DAILY REMINDERS

    #1: Please use proper money management.  Whether you flat bet my plays or play them according to the Unit ratings, PLEASE bet within your means.

    #2: Unless otherwise stated, my daily card is FINAL at 6 p.m. Eastern Monday through Friday and Noon Eastern on Saturdays and Sundays.

    #3: PLEASE take a moment to tell your loved ones that you love them.  Take a moment to kiss your spouse/significant other, hug your children, call your parents, etc.  Those things are so much more important than betting on any sporting event, and you never know when it will be the last time you see them.

  •  Didn't know Wash was so strong and long!

    You stray from the play you will pay
  • much appreciated.....Beer

  • great call!! $$$$

    A little nonsense is relished by the wisest men.
  • Stevebeav

    PAC-10 TOURNAMENT TITLE.

    Pretty Even Reg-Season:
    1-1 Hm Tm Blowouts
    Combined Score: 
    Washington 169
    California 160

    (1) California vs (3) Washington

    After racking up 63.63% Winners Second Half (& 7-1 all yr w/GOW|GOM), hitting so many favorites, we finally missed w/BOTH DAWGS last night. 

    Must admit to underestimating Cal's Motivation & Washington's ability to overcome NCAA Tourney Pressure ('Win-or-NIT').  Lessons Learned

    Of all the compelling g match-ups today, onc of the most mis-understood, poorly anaylised & CLEARLY ATS-Effected 1-on-1 duels today at Staples is PG.

    On the Surface, we'd will continue to hear that CAL has the unquestioned & significant Match-up advantage at the POINT:

    All-Everything, Bears 5-10 Sr PG J Randle one & only identified flaw in many situations this season has been SIZE ISSUES, thus vs UW's 5-8, diminutive I Thomas, Randle has a Rare, and welcomed reversal of this factor.

    SR Offensive Machine JEROME RANDLE vs

    Enigmatic SOPH ISSAAH THOMAS?

    Of corse, Randle is sensational talent - and his PERFECT First Half Statline vs Ore is a prime example of what the guy provides for the PAC-10 Champ
    Randle's Final PAC-10 Tourney Opening Half Act:
      FG: 8-8
      3's: 4-4
      FT: 2-2
      PF: 0
      PT: 22

    YET - Deeper look, comparing these 2 players
    Statistically produces stunning results:

    Jerome Randle has the Edge in some expected areas:

    Pts
    RANDLE 19 PPG
    THOMAS 17 PPG

    Assists
    RANDLE 4.5/Gm
    THOMAS 2.9/Gm

    eFG
    RANDLE 56%
    THOMAS 48.2%

    TRUE Shooting Percentage
    RANDLE 61.6%
    THOMAS 53.8%

    FT Percentage
    RANDLE 93.3% (2nd in Nation)
    THOMAS 73%

    3-pt Percentage
    RANDLE 41%
    THOMAS 31.5%

    Yet, Thomas has several SIGNIFICANT
    Often unexpected Better Numbers
    (Many obviously vital to UW Tm Effectiveness)

    Pts/40 Min
    RANDLE 21.7  
    THOMAS 22.2

    Rebounds
    RANDLE 2.06/Gm
    THOMAS 4.13/Gm (more than Double)
    (Thomas 2.1 O-Reb/Gm; Randall 1.4)

    Turnovers
    RANDLE 114
    THOMAS 73

    FT Rate
    RANDLE 31.3%
    THOMAS 50.6%
    (Getting into Lane, Drawing PF)

    FT MADE
    RANDLE 125
    THOMAS 147

    Asst/T-O Ratio, almost identical
    RANDLE 1.3
    THOMAS 1.27

    So where the RUBBER Meets the Road,
    Hard to say Thomas is better that Randall

    YET some numbers crunched show
    Thomas is awfully crucial to UW
    And playing at high level he is
    I Thomas is so big for Dawgs

    'Ruland Index' (+/-) 
    RANDLE +2.35
    THOMAS +3.06

    Thomas battling hand injury
    disastrous Half-Doz first few gms of season
    Puts Thomas' numbers in an even better light.
    And gives UW GREAT Shot Today

    Dawgs preeminent statistical numbers MUST be cross-examined w/Bears' Efficiency Numbers

    CAL shooting 60% vs UCLA?
    CAL's Last SIX GM:
    WINS BY:
    W-15
    W-24
    W-16
    W-10
    W-16
    W-13

    6-0 & 9-1 S-U & ATS

    I STILL LIKE Wash stay close all the way, And WIN THIS GM

    Lastly, even w/Cal pulling away from UCLA last night
    Bears played just 7, & Bench not reiiable
    Bears 4th PAC-10 in PF's (17.1/Gm)
    But U-Dub is unprecedented in DRAWING FOULS
    Wash #14 in D-1 (21.7/Gm) 

    Wash repeated & supposed lg size disadvantages
    Ought to be overcome by
    Much greater UW Depth
    And Key Defensive match-ups

    Looking at these numbers shows
    Cal doesn't have as many
    Clear Experience & Size Edges as it may appear

    LINE-UP:
    UW Jr F (6-9 | 240) M Bryan-Amaning  
    CAL Sr F (6-8 | 230) J Boykin

    UW Sr F (6-6 | 215) Q Pondexter  
    CAL So F (6-7 | 215) O Amoke

    UW Jr F (6-6 | 180) J Holiday  
    CAL Sr F (6-6 | 225) T Robertson

    UW So G (5-8 | 185) I Thomas 
    CAL Sr G (5-10 | 172) J Randle

    UW Jr G (5-11 | 185) V Overton
    CAL Sr G (6-5 | 215) P Christopher

    Key Reserves:
    CAL So G (6-3 | 185) J Gutierrez
    UW Fr G (6-3 | 190) A Gaddy

    CAL So G (6-4 | 185) DJ Seeley
    UW So G (6-4 | 205) E Turner

    CAL Sr G (6-3 | 185) N Knezevic
    UW Fr F (6-7 | 255) T Breshers
     
    Role Players (14% Tm Min or Lower)
    CAL Fr 5-11 B Smith
    UW So 6-8 D Gant
    UW So 6-6 S Suggs

    WASH DEF Pressure masked by their HIGH OCTANE Tempo
    6 of 8 Gms, UW kept Opp low 40% FG or lower

    Cal's tendency to have lapses appeared yesterday again
    Falling behind 39-30, till going on 24-5 run to pull away.

    Misc Last Thoughts:
    Cal so good at getting to & Cashing at Line:
    Cal Starters: 22-23 FT v UCLA

    Wash got jitters out vs Ore St
    DOMINATED Stanford entirely

    Cal's HIGH RPI, Great Play
    Six and 9 or 10 Spread Covers
    COULD have made for a -6 Plus Bears' Line
    So Linesmakers MUST feel they know something
    GOTTA be CLEARLY seeking Bear Money!

    Cal playing so Efficient keeps this at from
    Being even BIGGER

    G.O.M. | 3 UNIT
    WASHINGTON +2
    vs CALIFORNIA

    1 UNIT | 4.5 PT TEASER
    KANSAS STATE vs KANSAS | OVER 143
    WASHINGTON vs CALIFORNIA | UNDER 156

    LETS' GET IT!

    GREAT CALL Steve & another great Pac-10 season for you buddy.

    GoodFella: Available Packages & Home Page | GoodFella on Twitter

    Futures: 2011 St Louis Cardinals to win the N.L. Pennant +600 (Winner)

    Futures: New England to win the AFC +300 (Winner)

    Futures: Michigan CFB Team Wins OVER 7 (Winner)

    Futures: Denver Broncos Team Wins UNDER 5.5 (Loss)

    Futures: Detroit Lions Team Wins OVER 7.5 (Winner)

    Futures Pending: Chicago Bulls to win the East +250

    Futures Pending: LA Clippers to win the West +500


Page 1 of 2 (13 items) 12