When Alinsky writes "To Irene", he is not making an acknowledgment. Those were his intended dedications.
Where Lucifer comes into play is in a "front-piece", which is used to set the tone for the writing ahead, and help to establish what is going to be discussed. Here is the front-piece in its entirety -
'Where there are no men, be thou a man. "
—RABBI HILLEL
"Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I
should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a **** of my soul. . . "
—THOMAS PAINE
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very
first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to
know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which),
the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and
did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.
—SAUL ALINSKY
That was Alinsky setting the stage for the book ahead. There just is no way to take those quotations, and the diverse ideas being represented, and somehow come up with the notion that "Alinsky Dedicated his book Rules for Radicals for Satan" in the context you were trying to use it. Somehow you did not seem to mention Rabbi Hillel, or Thomas Paine, or the actual quotation. Sorry, but you did something that I perceive as being intellectually dishonest.