Not to beat a dead horse here, but I had been agnostic on the game-saving flag for FSU until I watched a video clip from the end zone.
It shows beyond question that nobody got picked on that play. First, everyone had the wrong WR identified as the flagee - the announcers and the score sheet had it on the slot receiver - Prosise, but it was called on the outside WR - Fuller.
Prosise's defender initiates the contact and jams him before he reaches the endzone and he's trying to get through the jam - that is very clear and he was not flagged, though that's what everybody thought the infraction was.
What the end zone video angle shows for Fuller is that he is clearly making a cut to his left and his defender very, very clearly cuts in the same direction to cut him off. If that defender wants to get at Robinson - he has a clear path to do so - and so in no conceivable sense is he being picked off covering Robinson - he is just following his man.
Robinson is in motion behind these two receivers (slot and wide) and FSU is in man coverage. The FSU defender who needs to get to Robinson is completely out of the play and not picked by anybody. He needs to either go in front of or behind the traffic jam caused by the other two match-ups and he doesn't really do either.
Brian Kelly correctly describes the whole incident by stating that FSU was rewarded for its blown coverage. In real time, the play was deceptive because you think that there should be someone covering Robinson and the two guys closest to Robinson were engaged with other receivers --- but that was not due to a pick - it was due to their own coverage choices and assignments. Robinson was wide open and it was a perfectly legal TD.
Damn.
I don't think I can directly link the video - but just go to "NDInsider" and you'll see a video clip for "End zone view of controversial call"