Absolutely. Especially if he's not 100%

100% they are... whether he's injured or not, Tomlinson isn't what he used to be.  Before the game, I was more worried about Sproles since I had money on Indy

No doubt.

 I think most of us agreed on this before yesterday's game, shouldn't even be much debate after watching the game. Unless LT is going to be the backup(and i am talking about a healthy LT), then they are better off without him

Jeff Bonds:

Dude hasn't made a cut like that in at least 2 years.

Are they better off using Sproles much more in game action right now, absolutely. Are they better off with no LT, even as someone they can use as a change of pace back? No way IMO. He's not the slashing running back he was in the past, but the kid still makes defenders look his way..

62-38 split right now