» Blogs Home

Post Archive


Search

Dan Bebe (see all posts from)

Five Days of Fun: NBA RoundUp for 2/3

by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 11:55 PM
I will admit, writing these blogs is always easier off a sweet day, and it seems to get exponentially easier when we're rolling! Last night's Paid Play winner on the Cavaliers/Grizzlies Under puts our Paid Plays on a friendly little 9-5-1 run, and moves Paid Play Totals to a robust 6-1 since turning Pro!

The Free Premium selection of the Pacers was an easy winner, as they dominated the Raptors from start to finish, and Free Premium plays are now on a 10-4 run of their own!

Yes, that means we're 19-9-1 overall, and on a 7-1-1 run since the 0-2 Thursday last week. You want a bounceback? I'll give you a bounceback - 5 days worth!

Sports Wagering

Nets @ Raptors - This line is OFF. Oh, the Nets, so close! One point away from another cover last night, and now they have to go on the road and play a very tough Raptors team, also on a back-to-back, but coming off a sluggish loss in Indiana. Toronto beat New Jersey earlier this year, also in Toronto, by 17, and honestly, I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen again. Still, Toronto is due for a couple of failed covers, and I just wonder if the Raptors aren't going to be looking ahead to the 2 days off after this game against the pathetic Nets. And yet, I keep going back and forth on this one, since Toronto has shown that they're more than capable of beating the piss out of teams up in Canada. Let's dig a little more. The Raptors are a strong 14-9 ATS at home on the season, and 5-2 ATS at home in January. They are also generally a poor team on the back-to-back, but this going to be only the 2nd time all season they will be playing the latter half of the back-to-back on their home court, and they had no problem last time in that spot, dispatching the Spurs in a low-scoring tilt. No surprise here, the Nets are 0-10 SU on the second half of a back-to-back, but are also only 3-7 ATS. Despite their recent run of improved play, I'm not sure I can support a play on the Nets here. The covers have all come at home on this little ATS mini-run for the Nets, where they're now 9-14 ATS; they're just 7-17 ATS on the road. It's chalk-laying time, and I lean Toronto on the side. No lean on the total yet, though in my gut I'm thinking we might have some value in the Over.

Clippers @ Hawks - This line is OFF. This line being off just strikes me as silly, considering Chris Kaman was the question mark, and he played against the Bulls. Drop a line, damn it! The Clippers got a nice straight up win over the Bulls, but now have to head down south to Hotlanta, another team finishing up a back-to-back. The difference here, the Clippers got a win, and the Hawks got bopped by the Thunder. I really wish I had strong feelings on this side either way. The Clippers are on the last game of an 8-game road trip, so I have to lean the other way just based on that fact alone, but I'm not sure that the line is going to be short enough for the Hawks to cover. Obviously, I like Atlanta at home, where they're 17-7 ATS, but they've really leveled off after a crazy-hot start. Still, there aren't many angles pointing us against the Hawks, other than the fact that they're just not scoring now like they did at the beginning of the year, and you have to think they're tiring a tad. We'll roll with it: I lean Hawks. I think the total might afford some value, with the Clippers more inclined to keep the game relatively slow, running a set offense that relies on Kaman on the low block, Camby at the top of the key, and a lot of screens. They just don't get out on the break much, and when they do, they look uncomfortable. And while the Hawks couldn't really slow down the Thunder, I doubt the Clippers can put up those same numbers. I like the Under.

Bulls @ Sixers - Philly by 1.5 with a total of 194. I'll say right now, I pretty much hate this one. The Bulls are back on the road for 2 games after 1 ugly loss at home that immediately followed a very strong 7-game road trip. There is almost no way to know what kind of effort we're going to get from Chicago in this one. The immediate thought is that they're going to be tired, and damn it, they should be. So, do we like the Sixers? I sure as hell don't. Philadelphia remains one of the worst home bets in the NBA at 5-18 ATS at home. They've lost 3 straight games and have failed to cover 4 straight, and they just keep hitting for a couple games, then missing badly for a couple. This is the ultimate unpredictable outcome on the side. Chicago is 0-5 SU in home-to-road back-to-backs, so this isn't a good spot for them on the fatigue front, as well as the weird scheduling front. They also have a game with the Hawks on Friday, though I wouldn't really call it a look-ahead spot. Chicago beat Philly by 6 way back on November 14, so I'm not sure if this is really a revenge spot for the Sixers. Honestly, this game just makes me shrug, and wonder if there's any reason at all to flip a coin and go with one team or the other. The first meeting between these teams hit just 182 points, yet this line is actually higher than the 190 posted for the first game, but I just don't think these games are correlated. I think it goes Under again.

Wizards @ Knicks - This line is OFF. And when it does come out, I'm going to take a long look at it, since there are definitely a couple angles at play. Most importantly, these teams just played a few short days ago, and the Wizards dealt the Knicks a 10-point loss in Washington, despite the Knicks actually being favored by 2. There should be some revenge at play, though the Knicks have been slumping like crazy. New York has lost 3 straight and 5 of 6, including extremely disappointing losses at home to Toronto (blew a double-digit lead), and on the road in Washington and Minnesota. The Knicks aren't scoring, and they're not playing much defense, either, and it's tough to really pinpoint where things started crumbling, since just about every facet of the team's play has taken a severe hit. This isn't a traditional home-and-home, as both teams had 1 game in between their two contests, and both teams played pretty terribly -- the Wizards had the complete meltdown against Boston, and the Knicks, as we noted, got clubbed by the Wolves. So, which team has the motivation, if there is indeed any to have? The Knicks have the revenge, but they're only 12-16 ATS in revenge spots, so I'm not sure how much stock we can put in that. The Wizards are, despite the meltdown against the Celtics, playing better basketball than the Knicks right now. If Antawn Jamison didn't play his worst game of the season, Washington would have covered, and maybe even won their last game. But, as it stands, they did not. Still, I think the revenge might actually get us a point or two of bonus value on the Wizards, who will probably lose the game, but have a nice shot to cover; tiny lean to the Wiz. These teams almost hit the total right on the nose in their last one, so let's see where oddsmakers bring this one out. I would think just a shade lower, as New York should continue to stink, but the Wizards won't shoot as well on the road.

Heat @ Celtics - This line is OFF. This is a double-revenge spot for Miami, but the Heat are struggling mightily right now, so which angle weighs heavier? Well, Miami has lost 2 straight to the Bucks, they've lost 4 of 5 overall, picking up the lone win in there against the hapless Pistons. So, how will this hot-and-cold Miami team respond with a chance to up-end the mighty Celtics? That is the question that drives us. One can only assume the Heat will be grabbing a few points here against the Celtics, but with a rematch with Lebron waiting for Miami tomorrow, this is not going to be a fun 2 days for the Heat (barring two miracle wins). Still, with this daunting task ahead, I get the feeling Miami is really going to get up for a game with Boston. They know the Celtics are scuffling a bit, and are, to a certain degree, vulnerable. My concern here is that Boston will be undervalued because of those losses, but these are the Celtics we're talking about. Even when undervalued, they're still not a very good deal. The much-needed win over Washington might propel Boston to a couple more wins, but I just wonder if they'll cover against a Heat team that should be quite angry coming in here. I lean Miami. My feelings on the total are going to rely heavily on where it opens up. Both games with these teams have featured a posted mark of ~187 - the first went under, the second went over. Let's let the oddsmakers guide us a little bit here before showing our hand. I do have a feeling this one stays Under, but that's not a lean, not until we see the line.

Thunder @ Hornets - Oklahoma by 1 with a total of 193. Revenge time for the Thunder! Not only that, home revenge, as the Hornets beat Oklahoma by 5 as a 5-point dog back at the beginning of the year 2010. Right off the bat I'm looking at the Thunder here, and some angle is going to need to make me rethink this. Let's see what we can find: the Thunder are indeed on a back-to-back, and that is likely why we're seeing this line as low as it is, since we can safely assume the Thunder would be favored by 3 if not for the fatigue issue. Indeed, Oklahoma is coming off a hard-fought win over the Hawks, though to be fair, they led most of the game, Atlanta came back to tie it up early in the 4th, but the Thunder immediately pulled back out ahead, and held on down the stretch, and I'm not just not sure how much that took out of them. Last time the Thunder beat the Hawks, they beat Minnesota in the next game, but failed to cover, yet bounced right back with a few straight covers after that ATS loss. I realize that was a rambling thought, but I wanted to make clear that the Thunder seem to be highly focused, and don't seem to struggle with letdowns after battling Atlanta. So what about back-to-backs? The Thunder are just 4-5 SU, but have consistently outperformed the line with a nice 6-3 ATS mark on zero rest. The Hornets already seem to be feeling the effects of playing with Chris Paul, and I just don't think New Orleans can really compete for 48 minutes, even at home with rest, against a superior Thunder team that might have taken them lightly (due to Chris Paul's injury), except that the Thunder are going to want to get revenge. They're 7-5 ATS revenging a home loss, and this game is basically a pick. I lean Thunder, and I lean Over, as I feel defense will be lacking.

Warriors @ Mavs - This line is OFF. Ouch, if you're a Warriors guy. This team just got throttled by Houston, and now we have to try to determine if they'll bounce back accordingly. I'm not really sure why this line isn't posted, other than to make us more and more angry about not having any lines. Still, the Warriors beat the Mavs in Dallas back near the end of November, and 8-point outright victory as a 12.5-point underdog. So we have some strong angles, after all. We have the Warriors coming off a terrible performance, where I might normally advise backing them. We have the Warriors on a back-to-back, where they are 7-4 ATS, another sneaky reason to back Golden State. Then, we have the Mavs awful defense at home, and terrible ATS mark: Dallas is just 5-17 ATS at home, and allow nearly 100 points. Golden State will almost surely break 100. Dallas is also just 1-4 ATS when revenging a home loss, so it seems almost like they get tight when trying to get revenge, or the line inflation certainly comes back to bite them. Can we really back Golden State right now? They don't really have the talent to keep up with almost anyone, especially on the road, but Don Nelson still has some tricks up his sleeve facing a number of his former players, and I'm inclined to take the points with the huge road dog (line TBA). I also think that because Dallas plays no defense at home, I have to look at the Over first and foremost.

Suns @ Nuggets - This line is OFF. It's getting a little sickening how many lines are off, and how theoretical we're being forced to become, since we're literally finding angles before the line comes out and trying to determine where the line should be, and what's a trap, etc. Here, the Suns, suddenly playing with a little heart (but still not a great deal of skill) roll into the rather unfriendly confines in the Mile High City. To Phoenix's credit, they did cover in their only game against the Nuggets this year, losing by just 6 here in Denver as a 9-point underdog. Now, they come to town having won, and covered 3 in a row, including road wins at Houston and at New Orleans, but this will easily be the biggest test for the Suns since taking care of Dallas at home. The Nuggets have won 10 of 11 games, though they're not covering at nearly the same clip. The lack of Carmelo Anthony certainly changes how the Nuggets play, though they can still clearly win at home even without their leading scorer. The questions here include "can the Suns keep it up?" and "will Carmelo play, and if so, what will the line be?" Honestly, it's almost impossible to get a feel for the line until we know what the deal is with the injuries. To a certain degree, I hope Carmelo DOES play, since he'll move the line 2.5 points, most likely, and give us a little more value with the Suns. As you can see, I lean slightly to the Suns. The total went way under the last time these teams played (204, under 225 by 21 points), so while I do fully expect another under, it depends how much oddsmakers adjust.

Spurs @ Kings - This line is OFF. No surprise there, with both Tyreke Evans and Tony Parker questionable. Oddsmakers are really making us work these days! In any case, this is a double-revenge game for the Kings, with the Spurs beating them down both times the teams met so far this year, both times in San Antonio, mind you. Perhaps more interesting than the injury situation and the two previous big wins for the Spurs is the fact that there has been almost zero defense in both of the previous meetings. I immediately think that this total is going to be the point of value. The Spurs shot well over 50% in both games, and the Kings shot over 50% in the second meeting, and after the first game went over the posted mark of 201.5 by about 6 points, the second game soared over the total by 22. I am very curious to see where this line opens, since both of the previous games had posted totals in the 202 range. Oddsmakers should probably adjust that number up to the 210 area, but with the Spurs embarking on the rodeo road trip (and potentially without their fast-break artist, Tony Parker), and the Kings offensively challenged lately (other than a freak performance in Denver), I think we may get some huge value on the Under. Yes, that's a lean. In terms of the side, I have to take an initial look at the home dog. I know they're not technically a dog until the line comes out, but if Tyreke Evans misses another game, I don't see how there's any chance I can pick a side on this one. If he plays, I lean Kings.

Blazers @ Jazz - Utah by 7 with a total of 198. Finally, a game with a spread, and it's not even a game I like all that much. The Blazers will likely be without Brandon Roy for one more game, an this would really be a nice time to have him back. The Blazers are on double-revenge here, losing both in Utah and in Portland to the Jazz, who, for what it's worth, rolled over Portland in both games. Utah has shot 60% in both games, winning by 16 at home, and 11 on the road. Can the Jazz really shoot 60% again against the Blazers? I really doubt it. I realize Utah is surging, winning 6 in a row, and covering 5 of those 6, but this is a letdown spot for them, coming off the big home win over the Mavs, and something of a slight look-ahead spot with the Nuggets coming to down on the 6th of the month. I think Portland has the spread edge here, since most folks will think Utah covers 7 pretty easily against the Blazers, still without Roy, but Portland is right in that enviable spot where they got crushed a few times, lost their superstar, then as soon as folks forgot they existed, they started covering. Portland has covered 6 of 8 games, and Portland is a strong 15-8 ATS on the road, and 4-3 when revenging a home loss. I lean Blazers. On the total, I lean Under, given both of the previous games have hit 200, and now it's time to squeeze under the mark, especially with key components of both teams missing.

Bobcats @ Lakers - LA by 9 with a total of 191. This isn't a great spot for either team, really. Our job is to figure out which team it is a worse spot for. The Lakers come home off a brutally long 8-game road trip, but for the most part, a productive one, going 5-3, with only 1 of those 3 losses a game the Lakers probably "should" have won, that being in Toronto. Not a great road trip, but for one of the best teams in the League, winning 62.5% of road games will most certainly get the job done, especially when the Lakers are a robust 23-3 at home! However you feel about the road trip, the first game home is never easy. Just look at the Chicago Bulls last night, home off their 7-game west coast swing, and looked comatose throughout the entire game. But here, there's a problem. I'd love to immediately say "strong lean" to Charlotte, but the Bobcats are on the final game of their own 6-game road trip, another prime letdown spot, especially for a young team. The Bobcats might be looking ahead to getting home, though I suppose a game with the Lakers is nothing to look past. We need to remember, too, that the Bobcats do not fear the Lakers. They beat them twice last year, sweeping the season series, as LA clearly did not take them seriously, and you just wonder if this one has all those same markings. The Lakers were 11-point home favorites over Charlotte last year, so Charlotte has improved 2 points in a year, and Charlotte won that game by 7. I do lean to Charlotte here, and I lean to the Under, since I doubt we'll see anyone trying to really run away with this one.

188 Comments:

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 8:57 PM

NEW LINK, RIGHT HERE, TWEET AWAY MY LOYAL BLOGGERS!

http://bit.ly/d49MaS

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 8:58 PM

And remember tomorrow's package is already for sale, off the 2-0 sweep today, 7-1-1 run since Friday and 19-9 run over the last 3 weeks or so!

http://bit.ly/7YykMu

 

posted by guevones on 02/02/2010 9:15 PM

tough card tomorrow, especially with no damn lines. this no line thing is really getting out of freakin hand.

 

posted by guevones on 02/02/2010 9:19 PM

i guess i'm leaning warriors, kings, and hawks, but none of those are strong at all, and only one of those has a line on it so who the hell knows.

i like your thoughts on a dallas over, Dan.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 9:22 PM

Haha, yeah, we really need some damn lines, since they can tell us almost as much as the situational angles!

If our buddy Anjorlino is around, I might recommend passing, since so few games actually have lines.

 

posted by tonydaguru on 02/02/2010 9:23 PM

Hey Dan, my early leans for tomorrow are in this order :

ATL  

slight lean toCHI/PHI over

slight lean to POR/UTAH under

slight lean to Lakers

any thoughts?

TonyDaGuru

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/02/2010 9:26 PM

nice read Dan.. I really leaned Utah at first look but after reading your blog.. I might go the other way and follow you.. I'll read again your blog when I get home but for now I have to go.. I have to fix something.. You know, so I can get 1 step forward in my plans of living there.. goodnight everyone.. Congrats again Dan.. I really didn't know how to read the line for the atl/okc game and it cost me 1 unit..

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 9:28 PM

Evening Tony!

Honestly, because so few of these games have actual lines, I don't feel like my early thoughts should weigh that heavily.  Let's wait and see how things roll tomorrow morning, and I'll be glad to break down any leans then.

As far as your early leans, I like Atlanta, not a huge fan of the total in Philly, not a huge fan of the Lakers on the "first game home", but I do like that Portland/Utah Under, since it seems improbable that Utah will shoot 60% again!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 9:29 PM

Thanks Anjorlino!

Just be careful before backing Utah - I think the total is better than the side there, but POrtland is indeed on double revenge, and Utah's value is VERY low right now, courtesy of their monster win streak...

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/02/2010 9:34 PM

okay be back later.. yeah I might go with Portland and hopefully they will extend their streak to 4.. I love cha also.. I know that you really love fading teams on their first game at home coming off long road trip...

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/02/2010 9:34 PM

okay be back later.. yeah I might go with Portland and hopefully they will extend their streak to 4.. I love cha also.. I know that you really love fading teams on their first game at home coming off long road trip...

 

posted by tonydaguru on 02/02/2010 9:36 PM

Yeah I hear you about the lines not being up.  I have a busy day at work tomorrow, so I will probably check the lines and post my final leans around lunch time.  I would greatly appreciate your thoughts and insight before I finalize my card around 5:00 p.m. central time.

Good night to all!

TonyDaGuru

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 9:40 PM

Anjorlino - Yeah, very dangerous spot for the Lakers, and Charlotte has had their number, amazingly.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 9:41 PM

Tony -

I'll definitely do my best, though I may need a subtle reminder - feel free to hit me with a DM or @reply on twitter if you can't get on Pregame from work!

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/02/2010 9:47 PM

Great write-up again dan thx my man. Your kickin ass as of late. And as a product of that we all are!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/02/2010 9:54 PM

Haha, trickle down betting economics?

 

posted by Hotspur on 02/02/2010 10:46 PM

Good morning My Buddies...Dan you are the king...G we had the balls man and those Okey boys came storming in for us to give me a 5-1 humbling on the night. Get in Indy, Okey  and Cavs on the sides and Cleve and Orlando on the under.  Only the over on Clippers went down but hey i cab be a gracious loser there.   Bounceback I'll say...!  Dan you are an inspiration my friend

 

posted by ericcogdell on 02/03/2010 4:06 AM

I really like your analysis Dan, GREAT stuff. I watched both of the Bobcats victories over the Lakers last year and I tell you what, they just seem to have their number. This Bobcats team is much improved this year as you know as well, much better than the two points difference imo. I also feel the Portland side is stronger than most probably feel. Imo the under is still the stronger play on that game as I agree that it is very unlikely the Jazz will repeat a third game shooting 60% from the field, that seems absurd, especially with no Boozer available. Lastly, I really like playing the Thunder. I have been winning with them quite a bit lately including last night against the Hawks. They seem to actually play BETTER on btb situations so no fear there for me ever. Anyway, take care and keep crushing brother!

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 5:11 AM

Great picks Dan! I forgot to gett on the Cavs under which was a little frustratin, but at least my only bet - the thunder - came in so I can be content

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:37 AM

Hotspur!

GREAT effort, buddy!  Love to hear about you guys dropping a 5-1 or 3-0 day out there!

Before you know it, you'll be able to start increasing the value of a unit!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:40 AM

Hey Eric!

REALLY glad to see you here in the blog!  I've seen you post over in Hook's thread a few times, and you're clearly a SHARP guy!!

You've got a few nice angles there, and this a.m., after recording the podcast, I'm probably going to go back to the lines and see what's shaking out.

Can the Bobcats keep up their surprising dominance of the Lakers?  That's the big question today, for sure!

 

posted by albsure2422 on 02/03/2010 6:41 AM

fade the hornets, I am glad i took the season under of 46.5 wins this year...Hopefully it comes thru

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/03/2010 6:41 AM

going for chi and cha.. what do you think?

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:41 AM

Benny boy!

A 1-0 day is never a bad thing.  Sorry you were unable to get on the Cavs under - I did release that play a little later than usual because of some computer issues, so I apologize for that.

I'll try to get today's paid play up earlier, so more folks can have a chance to purchase and then subsequently get on the play!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:43 AM

Albsure!

Good to see ya, my man!  Yeah, without Chris Paul, the Hornets are in some real trouble...

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:43 AM

Anjorlino -

I'm a little nervous about the Chi/Philly game.  If you really, really like the Bulls, go for it, but they could lay another egg.  I do like Charlotte at first glance, though.

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/03/2010 6:48 AM

+9.5 to +8.5.. so the sharps are with me right?

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:49 AM

Is that Charlotte? I haven't seen the morning moves yet - if so, that's a very good sign that early, sharp money is with you.

 

posted by uberVU - social comments on 02/03/2010 6:54 AM

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Fantasy_Champ: NBA Daily Sports Betting Preview for Wednesday (7-1 run!), come read up and chat with me! http://bit.ly/d49MaS

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:01 AM

Side note, guys.

I'm going to be starting a DAILY thread in the forum, rather than the gigantic 50-page behemoth that's running now that no one seems to pay attention to.

If you guys want QUICKER updates when the podcast is posted, when I post free plays, when my top play is loaded, just a quick post in that thread every day will then get you emails any time anyone else posts.

JTEvans - I know you just got into my giant thread, but I'm going to be phasing that thing out over the next few days.

Again, if you have any questions, let me know, but with the way that Pregame sends you an email when someone replies to a thread in which you've already posted, I thought having a daily "regular" forum thread might be a helpful tool in getting my messages out to the community.  Here is the link to today's:

pregame.com/.../735691.aspx

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/03/2010 7:01 AM

yeah.. it's charlotte.. BOL to everyone..

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 7:10 AM

Dan Bebe showing me some Thunder love. That's usually a good thing! Right now they are such fun to watch. For a young team they show some serious heart. Yes it's a B2B but it's not like it's true B2B on the road as they were in their beds last night and it's not that long of a flight into Nawlins. Gotta remember with the Hornets win in OKC that they are only a season and a half out from occupying that very same arena so they actually catch a bit of a break from the crowd as we were used to cheering Chris Paul and company (and if it weren;t for them, we wouldn't have the Thunder in the first place!). Tonight, however, OKC takes it to NO as *their* crowd has no love for Kevin (just give me my 30 points now)Durant and the crew.

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 7:29 AM

Dan please... no need to apologize. It was a mental error on my part - I just downright forgot as I was so intrigued by a fantastic film last night - Meet Joe Black.

Virtually no lines out atm (only 4 of 11 games) on the basketball over here... the thunder -1.5 are again tempting though, as too are Portland +7.5. Though my basketball betting may hinge on a very possible ALL IN PLAY I may make on my tottenham tonight haha.

 

posted by ericcogdell on 02/03/2010 7:29 AM

Denmark, what's up partner. Like I stated just a couple of posts back. I fear NOT btb for the Thunder. They seem to play BETTER on btb almost. I guess it's just their youth and exuberance so don't fear them on most light btb situations. Dan, I've seen movement already and I am jumping on it before it goes any higher. I am playing the OVER on the Sixers/Bulls game. It just jumped from 193 to 194. I am taking it now before it gets worse. I have a feeling it may rise a half or possibly a full point more. Take care.   Eric

 

posted by ericcogdell on 02/03/2010 7:37 AM

If you had told me before this season started that the Thunder and Grizzlies were going to be my two favorite teams to watch at the All-Star break I would have told you that either a) you needed to have your head examined or b) vice-versa. Seriously folks, this is why I LOVE THIS SPORT!!!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:41 AM

Good look, Anjorlino!  Good job posting in my daily thread -- you'll get emails now any time I add something to it!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:43 AM

Denmark  - What can I say, man?  I think the recent revenge spot should be enough to push them through the b2b potential fatigue.  I know NOT playing Chris Paul might actually keep the juices from flowing quite as hard for the Thunder, but the Hornets seem ripe for a losing spell...

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:44 AM

Benny -

ALL IN, eh??  I would never recommend that, but hey, gotta bet big to win big, right?  Haha.  Should be getting some more lines in the next 20 minutes or so, so that's exciting.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:45 AM

Go for it, Eric - I like both of those selection!

And yes, who would have thunk it...MEMPHIS?

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 7:58 AM

I say all in, but it's more like 5 units haha!!! It's more of a heart over brain play tbh lol!

I look forward to seeing some of these lines!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 8:22 AM

all lines are up now.

Dallas laying 12 at home. with their 5-17 home ATS record as Dan pointed out GSW looks very intriguing. 75 % on the Mavs as well, which makes GSW look even more inviting.

Raptors only laying 10.5 to the Nets also looks inviting, and now all of a sudden people are playing on the Nets to the tune of 69%. Are the Nets some kind of JM V1, V2, V3, Vr, or V5 play? Otherwise, the Raptors can easily win this game in the 15-25 point range, don't ya think? especially not having played last night and with the Nets playing B2B. I think this is a rare time where we are getting some value fading the Nets considerign their relatively decetn play over the last 4 games.

Alos, sitll liking the Hawks laying 10 over LAC at home and SAC getting just 3.5 as a home dog v. the Spurs. Between those two I like the Hawks a little better.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:06 AM

Hmm.. . These lines are a little interesting, but also a bit disconcerting.

I need to do a little more work on 'em, but I also need to hit the market, bank and post office.

Going to be a very busy day for your pal Dan Bebe!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:20 AM

PODCAST IS UP!

1) Direct link to audio: http://bit.ly/47ECku

2) Discussion thread: pregame.com/.../735791.aspx

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 9:24 AM

I don't think the Hawks/LAC line is unfair, bujt I think the Hawks lay the wood to the Clippers tonight and win this one by 15-20.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:28 AM

It's very possible, G.

I've got my eye on 2-3 sides and 2-3 totals today, and might have another top play total when all is said and done.

 

posted by sweetriver on 02/03/2010 9:38 AM

G and all, yes the plays for JM tonight are as follows, all v2.0 plays if that means anything:

1. MIAMI over boston

2. NEW JERSEY over toronto

3. OKLAHOMA CITY over new orleans

4. SAN ANTONIO over sacarmento

FYI, I am on them all so far, and FWIW, a system play in Hockey,  "B" play, on Carolina Hurricanes over Calgary.  All the Hoop leans are "A" plays

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:57 AM

Sweet - That's actually QUITE helpful.  Could explain a few of the half-point moves, and also why BetUS has crappier lines on those games for the road teams than any of the other online books.

This news makes me want to wait just a little longer before releasing any plays, to make sure the line moves back the way I expect.

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 10:04 AM

Thanks, Sweet. I knew there was no way NJN was getting that much backing from the gen pub. JM system might be helping me out today with Tor and Sac. I'm gonna wait and see on those two.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 10:20 AM

LEANTRACKER

Sides: Heat, Thunder, Bobcats

Totals: LAC-ATL Under, MIA-BOS Under, POR-UTA Under

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 10:31 AM

Alright guys, I'm stepping out to run 3-4 quick errands. Back in 2 hours, then PLAYS COMING then!

 

posted by butros on 02/03/2010 10:36 AM

@ sweetriver

none of these plays are JM v2.0, because v2.0 system is this: team needs to play at least 2 out of 3 games against teams vs. opposite conference on road trip. all these games are games against teams from same conference. I think this is v3.0 system but i doubt JM players bet this system and move those lines. good luck!

btw. tonight I like OKC -2 and Por@Uta under 197

OKC very good on b2b, NO now already couple of games without Chris Paul, Collison will struggle against defensive team (asists)..

Por@Uta under 197: I agree with Dan Bebe preview, Utah wont score 60% again and Portland cant compete with Utah`s big men, so they will miss a lot of jump shots..

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 11:33 AM

What are the John Morrison - Version Ocho picks tonight?

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 11:44 AM

Few thoughts on Miami:

To me, they are the most reliably unreliable team in the NBA. I mean, how do you know when they are going to come to play? Dan, maybe you have this figured out but I sure don't. They can beat good teams by 20 and turn around and get destroyed by 30, home or away. They can lose 5 straight ATS then follow it with 5 straight ATS wins.

here's something interesting about miami. only 3 times this year have has their straight up outcome differed from their ATS outcome. 3 times! i one point win over nola at home, a 1 point win over NJ at home, and a 1 point loss to LAL at LAL.

so, if you're thinking of taking Miami on the road, you should definitely go ahead and look at taking them on the ML as well. If you want to fade Miami, don't even glance at the ML, because if they lose, they have shown that they will also not cover the spread while losing.

 

posted by tonydaguru on 02/03/2010 12:33 PM

Ok, so I still like

ATL and

the under in Utah

the under in Sac/SA

still have leans on:

over in phi/chi,

LAL

OKC

any thoughts are much appreciated

TonyDaGuru

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 12:40 PM

G -

I couldn't agree more - this Miami team is either all there, or not there at all, and tonight I get the feeling they're going to show up to atone for 2 home losses to the Celtics earlier this year.  Boston has been an awful ATS pick at home, so yeah, maybe the Heat ML is the way to go?

 

posted by Five Days of Fun: NBA RoundUp for 2/3 – Dan Bebe | denmark News Station on 02/03/2010 12:42 PM

Pingback from  Five Days of Fun: NBA RoundUp for 2/3 – Dan Bebe | denmark News Station

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 1:00 PM

Alright Tony -

I think Atlanta line is pretty fair, I like the Under in Utah, I don't like the Under in Sactown, no opinion on the total in Philly, don't like the Lakers, like the Thunder.

Hahaha, that about covers it, I assume!

I just got home from my errands, as you can see, so now it's time for me to finalize my card, and hopefully sell a few packages! :)

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 1:05 PM

that's my problem with the Heat though: how can one get a motivational read on them? i sometimes wonder if their drug suppliers only come around every few weeks, and they struggle when their supply is running low.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 1:06 PM

Nah, in Miami the drug suppliers are on call!

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 1:16 PM

Hahaha.

 

posted by sweetriver on 02/03/2010 1:25 PM

BUTROS, you are most likely correct on JM, but the email I got says,

As a customer of my NBA v3.0 system, I want to send you a reminder

of our upcoming NBA v2.0 betting series:

so maybe he meant upcoming v3.0 vs v2.0, doesn't matter, either way they are plays that are "systematic" plays for him, gl either way to you

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 1:39 PM

Good call, Sweet, and good call, Butros!

Love it when you guys fire off info like that, and when we can dig and get to the correct solution!

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 1:41 PM

OH YEH BABY.... Leeds 1 - 3 Tottenham.... SHOW ME THE MONEY!

All in play is a winner... phew!!!!!! time to have fun with the NBA now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 1:42 PM

NICE BEN!

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 1:43 PM

So dan are we supose to switch over to the thread?

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 1:43 PM

Haha, well, since you're rolling in money, this is probably a good time to announce...

MY PAID PLAY IS AVAILABLE

I just finished the writeup (it's quite extensive), and the play is officially loaded into the package, so those interested, please do hop on board!

It is an ESPN TV NBA game play, and I think it's a sneaky-clever play!

http://bit.ly/7YykMu

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 1:46 PM

Nah, Uplay, either location is fine with me - the thread is just to reach out to the forum guys that are "afraid" to come into these long blogs with 100's of replies.  You blog experts are absolutely fine where you are, right here!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 1:47 PM

I should add, another reason to have the thread is because if someone posts in the thread, then when I post updates in it, they'll get emails alerting them that I've replied.

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 1:49 PM

haha sneaky and clever eh? sounds good to me

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 1:54 PM

you doing a freebie today or PP only?

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 1:55 PM

Dan would it be a bad idea to bet both miami and the O/U?

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 1:58 PM

It would be easier for us to follow if we are EITHER in the blog or forum.  When games come on we'll have 9 different windows open to keep up with the action and the discussions.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 2:00 PM

You guys that are here in the blog, just stay here - don't worry about that other thread.  It's just for the people that haven't found the blog or don't want to read it.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 2:01 PM

G - I'm about THIS CLOSE to making the Portland/Utah UNDER my free play.  Just waiting to make sure the Over doesn't get steamed late.

Uplay - Normally I'd say no, but I was having some issues on that exact game.  I say go for it; screw it, win 'em both!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 2:06 PM

can anyone enlighten me as to why the nuggets are only laying 7 in denver against PHX with 65% playing the Suns at that number? i don't really understand this. is it because of the Suns little streak they have going, because the Suns are a team I don't trust at all. I see also that Melo and Bbillups are both playing. Dan, is this a situation where you don't want to back a team because of a player returning from injury? i would think not considering Melo hasn't been out for a month or two or something like that.

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 2:06 PM

aight good shit thx.

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 2:06 PM

3 plays I like atm

Toronto game to go under

Warrirors +12

Thunder -2

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 2:23 PM

G, I don't have the FOGGIEST.  That might be one of those games where the oddsmakers just know more than we do, so I'm leaving it alone.

Uplay - No problemo - let's get it done!!

Ben - I'd be careful with the Warriors - that one looks too easy to me...

 

posted by Hotspur on 02/03/2010 2:25 PM

My card is almost complete now and my big plays are going to be Miami, clipps under and portland under.  Still considering whether to add okey to that...my head says yes but my gut is griping.......

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 2:30 PM

I'd be careful with OKC, Hotspur - they seem like an easy cover here, but I'm honestly a little surprised at how low the line is...

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 2:32 PM

I'm going with:

Utah under 196.5

Bos under 182.5

Okc -2

Char +10 (I think/hope Wallace is in there)

I see everybody like Miami but with the line down to -5.5 I'm going to pass.  Good luck to everybody tonight.  Lets keep the ball rolling!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 2:34 PM

Like that card, Coutu!

The Wallace issue is what kept me off that game, and I just don't want to take the chance.  Maybe a 1st half play?

 

posted by Hotspur on 02/03/2010 2:50 PM

nit nite guys best of luck all round

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 2:51 PM

Well guys, I don't think I can confirm my free play today.

I'm seeing fairly split money on the Portland/Utah Under at 196, and I think the total, if it does go Under, will only stay Under by a point or two, so I'm back off of that one.  I do still lean STRONGLY to the Under, and I lean STRONGLY to the Heat, but those are the two plays that ALMOST made the cut and just didn't quite get there.

Sorry about that guys!  But FREE PLAYS are on a 10-4 run, and I'm only going to put a play out there if I really, truly think it's perfect.

If I can do anything to convince you all that the Top Play is worth it tonight please do let me know, since I think it's going to be ANOTHER winner on top of our current 19-9 and 7-1-1 runs!

The package is available at my Pro Page right now for the standard $15!

http://bit.ly/7YykMu

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 3:07 PM

Nothing really screaming at me so played all 3 of my leans earlier for 0.6 units each.

Dan keep your train rolling tonight m8!

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 3:08 PM

btw wow 0.6 units each feels so little when I think I went all in earlier haha

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 3:11 PM

Haha, fair enough, Ben!  Can't convince you to get my play tonight with all those winnings?  Hahaha.

Kidding, kidding!  Kick some ass, my UK superstar!

And Hotspur, rest easy!!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 3:15 PM

you're scared of Wednesday, aren't you, Dan?

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 3:17 PM

Hahaha, G, you know me too well...

 

posted by Ben_HotspurPatriot on 02/03/2010 3:21 PM

I would be very very tempted if I didn't have a lecture at 10am tomorrow, because if I do I know I will HAVE TO watch it, which would mean very little sleep haha.

Best of luck though!!!!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 3:23 PM

Woah, new name?  Are you guys the same person?

 

posted by Ben on 02/03/2010 3:24 PM

Yeh sorry Dan... I don't usually log in unless i intend to buy because I prefer my name to be just 'Ben' lol

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 3:42 PM

so i wonder what the game of the day is okc?

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 3:45 PM

Bulls +2     heat+5.5    mia/bos under   suns+7    jazz/por under OKC-2.5 Dan what do you think?

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 3:49 PM

dan i'd like to know your opinion on my picks  tonight

clippers +10

chicago +2

miami +6

okc -3

how about new jersey they are +11

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 3:50 PM

Oh and the bobcats +9.5. Id like to mayb slim down the card a little if one or 2 or 3 stand out to you as weaker plays

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 3:53 PM

i'm going with the hawks, little one on tor - 6 first h, the warriors, and dan's PP. still kind of like Den and the kings later on this evening. we will see.

BOL everyone

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 3:59 PM

Woah, just a sec, fellas, hahaha. Trying to finish cooking, one sec.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 4:00 PM

Uplay - the only plays you've got that concern me are the Thunder and the Bulls - rock on, buddy!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 4:00 PM

Jkling, for whatever reason you picked a lot of games where my feeling weren't all that strong - I think the Heat is a GREAT choice, though!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 4:02 PM

G - I think the Kings might be the ultimate sharp public fade!

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 4:04 PM

Alright thx. Whats wrong with the thunder?(im dropping the bulls)

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 4:04 PM

we will see. the Kings have just burned me so many damn times that i am always hesitant to back them.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 4:07 PM

The Thunder line just feels way too easy, but hey, the suns beat up on the Hornets, too, so you could VERY WELL be in line for a blowout Thunder win!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 4:08 PM

Haha, yeah, those damn Kings and their 4th quarter meltdowns.  Something weird about that game - maybe the line is low because the Spurs are going to be on the road for about a century?

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 4:13 PM

I thinking the knicks/wizards game will hit over 202

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 4:19 PM

So dan those are the only 2 weaker games? Which do you think are the stronger of the four left?

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 4:21 PM

i know you hate my warriors play, Dan, but i can't ignore dallas' home ATS record (you've just got to beg me to not fade a team that is 5-17 ATS at home and giving up 12) and the Don Nelson going back to Dallas thing.

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 4:25 PM

That heat line is wierd. went up to six even though 62 percent is on them.

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 4:51 PM

final thoughts on okc and new orleans game? im leaning to okc on this one what does everyone think?

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:04 PM

I think we all kinda leaned to OKC, but I just can't quite pull the trigger - it almost feels too obvious, ya know?

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:05 PM

Uplay, I like all 4 of the other ones, though the Unders look especially nice to me!

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 5:14 PM

Good luck on the Paid Play Dan...especially since I got it!  Lets go Heat and Celtics DEFENSE

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:16 PM

DAMN RIGHT!  SAY IT WITH ME...DE-FENSE! *stomp stomp* DEFENSE!

Would love to see my Paid Plays on Totals go to 7-1 since turning Pro!

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 5:19 PM

So would this guy!

 

posted by sweetriver on 02/03/2010 5:21 PM

SHOOT, i missed the paid play, busy at work, I suppose it was Celt / Heat under yes?

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 5:22 PM

I'd love to see it go 7-1 too, Dan. DE-FENSE! *stomp stomp* DE-FENSE!

In the meantime... THUN-DAH!... woah-oh-oh-oh-oh THUN-DAH! woah-oh-oh-oh-oh

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 5:24 PM

You got it Sweetriver

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:24 PM

Was that AC/DC's Thunderstruck?

Haha, Miami might want to consider defending the painted area...these teams are shooting 62 and 55% so far!

Still, I think the tempo is generally decent, we just need some misses!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:25 PM

Sorry about that, Sweet!  Out of curiosity, since I'm learning how to be a Pro (in terms of timing, marketing, etc.) - would it have helped for me to get the play out earlier? Maybe post a message somewhere I didn't?  I just want to try to make my plays as accessible as possible, so I'm picking your brain! :)

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:30 PM

Ugh, bad quarter.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:32 PM

How about 67% shooting for the Heat, and 57% shooting for Boston?  Exactly what we wanted... :(

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 5:32 PM

Yes, that was the AC/DC hook for the night. Gold Star for Dan! OKC just playing around with Hornets as Durant only has 4 points. Hope that doesnt bite them in the butt like last night in the 4th quarter.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:36 PM

Hornets will make a run at some point - they just have a knack for laying it on the line at home.  Time will tell if that line was "fishy" or just "off"...

I'm pissed about the terrible defense in that 1stQ

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 5:41 PM

You can count on the Hornets making a run...they've made two of them. OKC pretty much calling this one in at this point.

Who told Boston and Miami they could put their shots into the cylinder tonight? Did they *not* get the memo?!?!?!?!

Off to get some BWW with the crew and cheer for KD to get his 30...or 40. Good luck!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:44 PM

Haha, rock and roll, Mark!

SOMEONE needs to stop shooting 60% eventually, right?  I mean, the TEMPO is what we want, since both teams are running the shot clock into single digits on almost every possession, but they just keep MAKING shots.

Also, Boston's 5 offensive rebounds have been leading to points, too.  I'm inclined to believe this game will even out with a stretch of hideous basketball when these shots aren't falling, and we definitely need it.

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 5:51 PM

If Sheed keeps missing those 3 balls and Glen "don't call me Big Baby" Davis keeps missing 10 footers the numbers will line up for us.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:53 PM

I agree, Coutu, misses are going to come, but Miami needs to grab a defensive rebound, too!

Boston's shooting percentage is actually deceptively LOW right now, because they keep getting put-backs instead of just making the initial shot.  I'd be willing to wager the Celtics are scoring on a higher percentage of possessions than their FG% would seem to indicate.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 5:58 PM

This is some of the worst defense I've seen in a while.

I'm about to launch a remote control.

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 5:58 PM

Heat certainly need to have some pride in their interior defense.  They are getting pwned at this point.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:00 PM

There have been SO MANY layups and dunks to this point, I can't even believe it.

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 6:04 PM

Anybody else want to smack the perma-scowl off Perkins face?  We get it already, you try really hard now wipe that shit off your face!!!!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:07 PM

I want to just pretend this first half never happened.  I am literally DEPRESSED at how poorly the Heat have rebounded, and how shitty Boston's defense has been.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:13 PM

WHAT THE F*CK!?!?!

5 points in the last 2 seconds???

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 6:26 PM

Not a good first half for us.  Looking for a second half meltdown to get us an under...we'll see.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:39 PM

This one may be in the tank.

Now comes my PERSPECTIVE post:

Still 19-10-1 over the last 30 plays, and 7-2-1 over the last 10, assuming this one continues down this ZERO-DEFENSE path.

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 6:45 PM

meh, shit happens.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 6:46 PM

Here we go, a botched call, then 2 technical fouls, and the points just keep coming...I've lost games before, but this one is REALLY going to piss me off for a while.

Two sweet games on TNT tomorrow - I've got some leans cookin', but I need to see how tonight's games shake out before I lay anything down.

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 7:15 PM

Lets go Thunda!  Please finish strong here and get us a win!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:17 PM

Haha, I would like some credit for saying that oddsmakers believed that game would be a CLOSE CALL!

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 7:20 PM

okc baby and the over hit

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 7:25 PM

whats everyone's opinion on the suns/nugs game?

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:29 PM

A lot of games going "Over" tonight

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:36 PM

And down the toilet that one goes - this is without question the angriest I've been about a game in months.

Boston played ZERO defense, as Miami is still shooting almost 53%, and the Heat allowed the Celtics dunk after dunk.

And when we finally had a BRIEF glimpse of hope at a few spots, the teams combined for 5 points in TWO seconds at the end of the 2nd quarter, and then the incorrect foul call on Rajon Rondo, followed by Miami's two technical fouls, and the ensuing 10 ticky tack foul calls...well, we just never could catch a break.

I'm planning on forgetting this day ever happened and moving on to tomorrow.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:38 PM

As far as perspective goes, I think it's damn nice that we're still 19-10-1 over our last 30 plays, so just under two thirds winners!

 

posted by wj6735 on 02/03/2010 7:38 PM

LETS GO WARRIORS

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/03/2010 7:38 PM

sorry about that Dan.. Bounce back? time to start a new streak.. I shouldn't have taken chi.. I was leaning okc and utah but I dropped both of them

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:40 PM

That's okay, Anjorlino - just one of those games where we couldn't catch a break.  Miami shooting 53%, Boston right at 50%, but with FIFTEEN offensive rebounds.  Just never had a chance.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:41 PM

Wow, Warriors charging hard!

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 7:41 PM

Dan -- sorry about the Total play on Miami/ Boston. Had an extra beer for you when I noticed what was happening on that screen. In the meantime me love me some Thunder!! They were starting to show some wear at the end of that one.though. Hawks took a bit out of them.

 

posted by wj6735 on 02/03/2010 7:42 PM

need a 7 point 4th by the jazz

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 7:46 PM

Jeez utah/por is going to go over too.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 7:47 PM

Haha, WJ, that might be a bit on the tough side - Kinda like what I needed with this ESPN game.

Fellas, this is why I made just ONE play tonight - something about the card just felt "off" when I was trying to narrow the plays down, and I really thought I had found the ONE value.  Clearly, I was wrong about the one value.

However, what I was NOT wrong about was the fact that this card was a little funny, and we're seeing it in action here.  The favorites are winning (though some failed to cover), but so far the favorite has won or is winning every single game.

 

posted by UPlay2WinDaGame on 02/03/2010 7:49 PM

OMG this miami game.... Fouled before the inboung and haslem missed a FT

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 8:03 PM

dam man miami didnt cover

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 8:06 PM

had miami +4 1/2

 

posted by jmjinx13 on 02/03/2010 8:07 PM

Can Utah shoot 60% in three straight vs Portland?  They're at 59% right now.

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 8:11 PM

jkling i never even saw it go below 5.5??? tough break there

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 8:12 PM

I mean, this is like a f*cking FULL MOON type day!

Jkling, we need to have a chat, buddy.  That game was at 5.5 at almost every offshore book.  You can't be giving away a FULL POINT like that.

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 8:13 PM

So Dan, to what do you attribute the "funny" feel to the lines tonight? I swear I go through something similar with Interleague Play in MLB but that's seems like it's more or less a data thing with me.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 8:18 PM

Denmark - I just felt like I capped games one way, and in the morning things looked good, and in the afternoon suddenly the lines all jumped a half point, and the bet% numbers were swinging all over the place.

And it was ALMOST like I was looking at two completely different boards in the morning and afternoon.  Total screwball day.

Wondering if I should have stuck with my Charlotte lean, which was initially my strongest play, but when the line just kept creeping up and Gerald Wallace was listed as "out", it got dumped.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 8:20 PM

Jmjinx - I honestly am FLOORED at how well Utah continues to shoot against the Blazers, but ya know, there was something about that game that kept it off my card, too.

Time to build tomorrow.

 

posted by jmjinx13 on 02/03/2010 8:28 PM

Utah finishes shooting 62.7%.  

Okur and Kirilenko a combined 19 of 22 from the field.

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 8:30 PM

my book man had it at 4 1/12

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 8:34 PM

Damn, Jkling, you got royally SCREWED on that one!  I'm VERY sorry to hear that!  You gotta get yourself an account with Bodog for betting underdogs!

Jmjinx - Unbelievable performance from the Jazz again!  VERY glad I took that game off my card!

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 8:35 PM

Hopefully the screwball day is an anomaly and not the norm in the coming weeks. Let me know if you need a new opening if this one becomes bad luck! I'll fire off some trance! LOL!!! (Things were going *so* good but then we switched the theme, and...)

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 8:39 PM

Haha, no way, man! We went 2-0 yesterday with the new theme!  This was just one of those days, I believe, and honestly, I'm REALLY glad I ended up just narrowing my card down to one play.  Obviously, I should have stuck with my Heat lean instead of the total, but still, MINOR damage compared to the rough night that about 95% of Pregame seems to be having.

I know it sounds nuts, but I'm okay with 0-1 in the long term.

 

posted by jonpistone2 on 02/03/2010 8:41 PM

hey dan....saw you talkin about bodog here...just curious---how many books do you have???

 

posted by gcoutu_9 on 02/03/2010 8:41 PM

I got no problem with Kobe getting hurt tonight.

 

posted by jkling24 on 02/03/2010 8:48 PM

i took the suns +7 and took bobcats +11 1/2

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 8:48 PM

glad to see i'm not the only one who flopped today. ugggghhhhh. really angry at myself. i never lay big chalk, but decide to do it on Tor (1h) and Atl and lose them both. I get my GSW and I bomb in CBB. one of those days ... sorry bout the loss, Dan. wasn't our day.

 

posted by denmarkok on 02/03/2010 8:50 PM

I hear ya...looks like I'm 1-2 on the night but I live to fight again. Still up and aiming for another winning week...and another winning month...and another winning year! (**fires up the synthesizers, drum machines and sampler in case the new theme starts tanking the mojo**)

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 8:50 PM

Hey JP!

I predominantly use Bodog for betting underdogs, and I have a small side amount in a BetUS account (for potential JM system fades).  That's normally enough in NBA season, since I bet a ton of dogs or tiny favorites in the NBA.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 8:53 PM

Yeah, just not a terribly impressive day, overall, but like Mark said, we MOST CERTAINLY live to fight another day!

This was a SMALL bump in the road.  Just 0-1 today...hell, we can make that back in ONE PLAY!

Sorry for you guys that got stuck with some other clunkers today - I guess the lesson is just not to screw with Wednesdays!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 8:56 PM

looks like the Hook had a 0-3 day too. bad day all the way around. come on, Sactown. get me a end of the night winna.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:01 PM

Ugh, damn, 0-3?  Ouch.  Tomorrow is going to be a rough podcast.

I feel like I keep having to mention that I did only go 0-1, haha.  We're acting like I went 0-10!!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 9:02 PM

i really wish i had gone 0-1 today, Dan.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:08 PM

Sorry about that, G.  I didn't mean to rub it in anyone's face, but you know how careful I have to be.

You're the kind of guy that hangs with me long, long term, and I cannot tell you how happy that makes me!

However, I have to make sure I keep reminding the folks that bounce on and off cappers that this 0-1 day is just a small blip in an otherwise extremely profitable 2-3 week stretch.  Just want to make sure the guys that just pop in and see if Dan Bebe is worth "following" that while today was by NO MEANS a good day, it also wasn't the day that the roof fell in.

I will, however, start another "bounceback" blog tomorrow, since that seemed to work nicely last time!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 9:14 PM

no worries, dude. i'm just upset with myself. i had a good night last night and i guess I got a little overconfident.

i haven't lost any confidence in your though. 0-1 ain't shit. just one game.

sorry for my negativity up in here, just extremely pissed off at myself, adn pissed at some teams that i backed.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:18 PM

It's ALL GOOD, G!  That's what I'm trying to say!  You're absolutely entitled to be pissed about a rough day.  We were ROLLING, so any time a day doesn't go as planned, it's a pain in the ass.

But we have to maintain our confidence, or we'll really get in some trouble.

That being said, since NEITHER of the games tomorrow have lines, I won't be posting my PACKAGE until tomorrow, since I want to be 100% certain I'm making a play before I jack something up there!

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:36 PM

Wow! The Kings covered!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 9:39 PM

holy shit. i just got a miracle cover in Sawtwon. down 13 with 1:40 left then I get 12 points including two 3 pointers from Tyreke (one 29 footer with 1 second left) and another 3 from Nocioni with 4 seconds left. that's right --- two 3s in the final 5 seconds for the cover. Wow. Sactown: thank you. You owed me that from a few months ago, and I don't feel bad about it one bit.

still a bad night for me, but that just made it a lot less bad.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:42 PM

There ya go, G!  The betting gods in Sacramento really owed you that one!

 

posted by guevones on 02/03/2010 9:44 PM

yes they did, Dan.

in the meanwhile, looks like my question above on why the Denver line was set low has been answered. Denver getting blown the eff out. Saw this line drop down to 6 before the game. was that on injury news or was that steam? i didn't keep up with this game at all.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 9:49 PM

Actually missed that line move, so I don't know for sure - maybe the Melo injury?

Still, Denver has looked BAD BAD BAD this game.  I can't wait to BACK the Nugs in their next one... :) ... gotta love those teams with a chip on their shoulder off an embarrassing home loss.

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 10:12 PM

LINK TO NEW BLOG!

http://bit.ly/bmafCz

 

posted by anjorlino on 02/03/2010 10:14 PM

1-1 night for me.. could have been 3-1 but I dropped my 2 okc and utah.. I missed the chance to earn today by dropping them.. and then I was also thinking of betting bigger units on CHA but got scared..

 

posted by Dan Bebe on 02/03/2010 10:18 PM

NEW BLOG:

http://bit.ly/bmafCz

Anjorlino - I'll respond to that lost comment in the new blog.

Featured posts from Dan Bebe



PregameForums.com: free sports betting picks, sportsbook gambling tips